• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Choosing the target difference ('effect size') for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA guidance protocol.为随机对照试验选择目标差异(“效应量”)——DELTA指南方案。
Trials. 2017 Jun 12;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5.
2
Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA guidance.选择目标差异并进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算——DELTA指南的制定
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2887-x.
3
DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.关于选择目标差异以及进行和报告随机对照试验样本量计算的DELTA指南。
Trials. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0.
4
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
5
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA five-stage study, including a workshop.RCT 样本量计算中目标差值指定的实用帮助:DELTA 五阶段研究,包括研讨会。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(60):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23600.
6
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Bias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance.改善健康试验中的测量反应偏差(MERIT):制定医学研究委员会指南的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 26;19(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3017-5.
10
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension.社会和心理干预随机试验的报告:CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Time Trade-Off Methods to Elicit Short-Term Utilities Associated with Treatments for Bulbar Urethral Stricture.使用时间权衡法得出与球部尿道狭窄治疗相关的短期效用。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Dec;3(4):551-558. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0133-4.
2
DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.DELTA 指南:选择目标差值以及进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 5;363:k3750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3750.
3
Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration.报告阶梯式楔形群随机试验:CONSORT 2010 声明的扩展,附有解释和说明。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 9;363:k1614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1614.
4
New guidance to improve sample size calculations for trials: eliciting the target difference.改善试验样本量计算的新指南:引出目标差异。
Trials. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2894-y.
5
Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA guidance.选择目标差异并进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算——DELTA指南的制定
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2887-x.
6
A study of target effect sizes in randomised controlled trials published in the Health Technology Assessment journal.一项对发表在《卫生技术评估》杂志上的随机对照试验中目标效应大小的研究。
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2886-y.
7
Can testing clinical significance reduce false positive rates in randomized controlled trials? A snap review.检测临床意义能否降低随机对照试验中的假阳性率?简要综述。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 28;10(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3117-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of the optimal sample size for a clinical trial accounting for the population size.考虑总体规模的临床试验最佳样本量的确定。
Biom J. 2017 Jul;59(4):609-625. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500228. Epub 2016 May 17.
2
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.一项混合方法研究,旨在评估针对女性压力性尿失禁患者在手术前进行侵入性尿动力学测试与临床评估及非侵入性测试的随机对照试验的可行性:INVESTIGATE-I研究。
Trials. 2015 Sep 8;16:400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0928-2.
3
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
4
Targeted survival improvements in clinical trials: are you an absolutist or relativist?临床试验中针对性的生存改善:你是绝对主义者还是相对主义者?
Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):335-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29031. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.随机对照试验中目标差值的指定方法:试验差值 elicitation(DELTA)系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001645. eCollection 2014 May.
6
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
7
Use of methods for specifying the target difference in randomised controlled trial sample size calculations: Two surveys of trialists' practice.随机对照试验样本量计算中指定目标差异方法的使用:对试验者实践的两项调查
Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):300-308. doi: 10.1177/1740774514521907. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
The tyranny of power: is there a better way to calculate sample size?权力的专制:是否有更好的方法来计算样本量?
BMJ. 2009 Oct 6;339:b3985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3985.
9
Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review.随机对照试验中样本量计算的报告:综述
BMJ. 2009 May 12;338:b1732. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1732.
10
Bayesian techniques for sample size determination in clinical trials: a short review.临床试验中样本量确定的贝叶斯技术:简要综述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2003 Dec;12(6):489-504. doi: 10.1191/0962280203sm345oa.

为随机对照试验选择目标差异(“效应量”)——DELTA指南方案。

Choosing the target difference ('effect size') for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA guidance protocol.

作者信息

Cook Jonathan A, Julious Steven A, Sones William, Rothwell Joanne C, Ramsay Craig R, Hampson Lisa V, Emsley Richard, Walters Stephen J, Hewitt Catherine, Bland Martin, Fergusson Dean A, Berlin Jesse A, Altman Doug, Vale Luke D

机构信息

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Jun 12;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5
PMID:28606102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469157/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A key step in the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the estimation of the number of participants needed. By far the most common approach is to specify a target difference and then estimate the corresponding sample size; this sample size is chosen to provide reassurance that the trial will have high statistical power to detect such a difference between the randomised groups (at the planned statistical significance level). The sample size has many implications for the conduct of the study, as well as carrying scientific and ethical aspects to its choice. Despite the critical role of the target difference for the primary outcome in the design of an RCT, the manner in which it is determined has received little attention. This article reports the protocol of the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) project, which will produce guidance on the specification and reporting of the target difference for the primary outcome in a sample size calculation for RCTs.

METHODS/DESIGN: The DELTA project has five components: systematic literature reviews of recent methodological developments (stage 1) and existing funder guidance (stage 2); a Delphi study (stage 3); a 2-day consensus meeting bringing together researchers, funders and patient representatives, as well as one-off engagement sessions at relevant stakeholder meetings (stage 4); and the preparation and dissemination of a guidance document (stage 5).

DISCUSSION

Specification of the target difference for the primary outcome is a key component of the design of an RCT. There is a need for better guidance for researchers and funders regarding specification and reporting of this aspect of trial design. The aim of this project is to produce consensus based guidance for researchers and funders.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCT)设计中的关键一步是估计所需的参与者数量。目前最常见的方法是指定一个目标差异,然后估计相应的样本量;选择这个样本量是为了确保试验有足够的统计效力来检测随机分组之间的这种差异(在计划的统计显著性水平上)。样本量对研究的开展有诸多影响,其选择还涉及科学和伦理方面。尽管目标差异在RCT设计中对主要结局起着关键作用,但确定它的方式却很少受到关注。本文报告了“试验中差异引出”(DELTA)项目的方案,该项目将为RCT样本量计算中主要结局的目标差异的设定和报告提供指导。

方法/设计:DELTA项目有五个组成部分:对近期方法学进展的系统文献综述(第1阶段)和现有资助者指南(第2阶段);一项德尔菲研究(第3阶段);为期两天的共识会议,召集研究人员、资助者和患者代表,以及在相关利益相关者会议上的一次性参与环节(第4阶段);以及编写和传播一份指导文件(第5阶段)。

讨论

主要结局目标差异的设定是RCT设计的关键组成部分。需要为研究人员和资助者提供关于试验设计这一方面的设定和报告的更好指导。该项目的目的是为研究人员和资助者制定基于共识的指导意见。