• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。

Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.

作者信息

Cook Jonathan A, Hislop Jenni, Altman Douglas G, Fayers Peter, Briggs Andrew H, Ramsay Craig R, Norrie John D, Harvey Ian M, Buckley Brian, Fergusson Dean, Ford Ian, Vale Luke D

机构信息

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresthill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8
PMID:25928502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4302137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central to the design of a randomised controlled trial is the calculation of the number of participants needed. This is typically achieved by specifying a target difference and calculating the corresponding sample size, which provides reassurance that the trial will have the required statistical power (at the planned statistical significance level) to identify whether a difference of a particular magnitude exists. Beyond pure statistical or scientific concerns, it is ethically imperative that an appropriate number of participants should be recruited. Despite the critical role of the target difference for the primary outcome in the design of randomised controlled trials, its determination has received surprisingly little attention. This article provides guidance on the specification of the target difference for the primary outcome in a sample size calculation for a two parallel group randomised controlled trial with a superiority question.

METHODS

This work was part of the DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) project. Draft guidance was developed by the project steering and advisory groups utilising the results of the systematic review and surveys. Findings were circulated and presented to members of the combined group at a face-to-face meeting, along with a proposed outline of the guidance document structure, containing recommendations and reporting items for a trial protocol and report. The guidance and was subsequently drafted and circulated for further comment before finalisation.

RESULTS

Guidance on specification of a target difference in the primary outcome for a two group parallel randomised controlled trial was produced. Additionally, a list of reporting items for protocols and trial reports was generated.

CONCLUSIONS

Specification of the target difference for the primary outcome is a key component of a randomized controlled trial sample size calculation. There is a need for better justification of the target difference and reporting of its specification.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验设计的核心是计算所需的参与者数量。这通常通过指定目标差异并计算相应的样本量来实现,这能确保试验具有所需的统计效力(在计划的统计显著性水平下),以确定是否存在特定大小的差异。除了纯粹的统计或科学考量外,从伦理角度出发,招募适当数量的参与者也至关重要。尽管目标差异对随机对照试验设计中的主要结局起着关键作用,但其确定却出人意料地很少受到关注。本文为有优效性问题的两组平行随机对照试验样本量计算中主要结局目标差异的设定提供指导。

方法

这项工作是DELTA(试验中的差异引出)项目的一部分。项目指导和咨询小组利用系统评价和调查结果制定了初步指导意见。研究结果进行了传阅,并在一次面对面会议上向联合小组的成员进行了汇报,同时还提出了指导文件结构的大纲,其中包含试验方案和报告的建议及报告项目。该指导意见随后进行了起草和传阅,以供进一步评论,然后定稿。

结果

制定了两组平行随机对照试验主要结局目标差异设定的指导意见。此外,还生成了方案和试验报告的报告项目清单。

结论

主要结局目标差异的设定是随机对照试验样本量计算的关键组成部分。需要对目标差异进行更好的论证,并报告其设定情况。

相似文献

1
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
2
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
3
Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA guidance.选择目标差异并进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算——DELTA指南的制定
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2887-x.
4
Choosing the target difference ('effect size') for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA guidance protocol.为随机对照试验选择目标差异(“效应量”)——DELTA指南方案。
Trials. 2017 Jun 12;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5.
5
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA five-stage study, including a workshop.RCT 样本量计算中目标差值指定的实用帮助:DELTA 五阶段研究,包括研讨会。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(60):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23600.
6
DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.关于选择目标差异以及进行和报告随机对照试验样本量计算的DELTA指南。
Trials. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.随机对照试验中目标差值的指定方法:试验差值 elicitation(DELTA)系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001645. eCollection 2014 May.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review.髋膝关节骨关节炎随机试验中样本量计算的方法学与报告的当前实践:一项系统评价方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 10;18(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2209-8.

引用本文的文献

1
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述:随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
2
Colchicine for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.秋水仙碱用于心血管事件的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 10;2(2):CD015003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015003.pub2.
3
Reporting and communication of sample size calculations in adaptive clinical trials: a review of trial protocols and grant applications.适应性临床试验中样本量计算的报告和交流:对试验方案和资助申请的审查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02339-7.
4
A protocol for the conduct of a multicentre, prospective, randomized superiority trial of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for humeral shaft fractures.一项关于肱骨干骨折手术与非手术干预的多中心、前瞻性、随机对照优势试验的实施方案。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Apr 22;5(4):343-349. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0151.R1.
5
Using the benefit-harm trade-off method to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of intensive motor training on strength for people with spinal cord injury.采用效益-危害权衡法确定强化运动训练对脊髓损伤患者力量的最小有意义效应。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Jun;62(6):314-319. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-00979-6. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Do patient characteristics matter when calculating sample size for eczema clinical trials?在计算湿疹临床试验的样本量时,患者特征重要吗?
Skin Health Dis. 2021 May 19;1(3):e42. doi: 10.1002/ski2.42. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Structure-Function Relationships in the Rodent Streptozotocin-Induced Model for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review.啮齿动物链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病视网膜病变模型中的结构-功能关系:系统评价。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;38(4):271-286. doi: 10.1089/jop.2021.0128. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study examining the efficacy of brief cognitive therapy for the treatment of panic disorder in adolescents (PANDA).一项随机对照可行性研究方案,该研究旨在检验简短认知疗法对青少年惊恐障碍(PANDA)的治疗效果。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Mar 3;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01009-z.
9
A systematic review investigating the use of microbiology outcome measures in randomized controlled trials evaluating antimicrobial stewardship interventions published between 2011 and 2021.一项系统性综述,调查2011年至2021年间发表的评估抗菌药物管理干预措施的随机对照试验中微生物学结果指标的使用情况。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Feb 24;4(1):dlac013. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac013. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.一项比较疼痛治疗沟通工具在急诊科腰痛或肾结石痛患者中有效性的多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(S1):S45-S55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306511.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.随机对照试验中目标差值的指定方法:试验差值 elicitation(DELTA)系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001645. eCollection 2014 May.
2
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
3
Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review.随机临床试验原始研究方案中样本量的确定:综述。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 21;346:f1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1135.
4
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
5
Urinary incontinence in men after formal one-to-one pelvic-floor muscle training following radical prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials.根治性前列腺切除术或经尿道前列腺切除术(MAPS)后正式一对一盆底肌训练后男性尿失禁:两项平行随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 23;378(9788):328-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60751-4. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.后路椎间盘镜手术与康复治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病伴下腰痛:随机研究两年随访
BMJ. 2011 May 19;342:d2786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2786.
7
Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.特发性全层黄斑孔行内界膜剥除与不行剥除的疗效比较:一项实用随机对照试验。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 1;52(3):1586-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6287.
8
The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference".“最小临床重要差异”的兴衰
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):283-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.013.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
10
Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives.当前样本量约定:缺陷、危害及替代方案。
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 22;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-17.