• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DELTA 指南:选择目标差值以及进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算。

DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK

Medical Statistics Group, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Nov 5;363:k3750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3750.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.k3750
PMID:30560792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6216070/
Abstract

Randomised controlled trials are considered to be the best method to assess comparative clinical efficacy and effectiveness, and can be a key source of data for estimating cost effectiveness. Central to the design of a randomised controlled trial is an a priori sample size calculation, which ensures that the study has a high probability of achieving its prespecified main objective. Beyond pure statistical or scientific concerns, it is ethically imperative that an appropriate number of study participants be recruited, to avoid imposing the burdens of a clinical trial on more patients than necessary. The scientific concern is satisfied and the ethical imperative is further addressed by the specification of a target difference between treatments that is considered realistic or important by one or more key stakeholder groups. The sample size calculation ensures that the trial will have the required statistical power to identify whether a difference of a particular magnitude exists. In this article, the key messages from the DELTA guidance on determining the target difference and sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial are presented. Recommendations for the subsequent reporting of the sample size calculation are also provided.

摘要

随机对照试验被认为是评估临床疗效和有效性的最佳方法,也是估计成本效益的关键数据来源。随机对照试验设计的核心是事先进行样本量计算,以确保研究有很大的概率实现其预先规定的主要目标。除了纯粹的统计或科学问题外,从伦理角度来看,必须招募适当数量的研究参与者,以避免将临床试验的负担强加给不必要的更多患者。通过规定一个或多个关键利益相关者群体认为现实或重要的治疗方法之间的目标差异,可以满足科学关注并进一步解决伦理要求。样本量计算可确保试验具有所需的统计效力来确定是否存在特定大小的差异。本文介绍了 DELTA 指南中关于确定随机对照试验目标差异和样本量计算的关键信息。还提供了对随后报告样本量计算的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac7/6216070/d147a3bf0ce2/cooj045314.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac7/6216070/d147a3bf0ce2/cooj045314.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac7/6216070/d147a3bf0ce2/cooj045314.f1.jpg

相似文献

1
DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.DELTA 指南:选择目标差值以及进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 5;363:k3750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3750.
2
DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.关于选择目标差异以及进行和报告随机对照试验样本量计算的DELTA指南。
Trials. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0.
3
Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA guidance.选择目标差异并进行和报告随机对照试验的样本量计算——DELTA指南的制定
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2887-x.
4
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA five-stage study, including a workshop.RCT 样本量计算中目标差值指定的实用帮助:DELTA 五阶段研究,包括研讨会。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(60):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23600.
5
Choosing the target difference ('effect size') for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA guidance protocol.为随机对照试验选择目标差异(“效应量”)——DELTA指南方案。
Trials. 2017 Jun 12;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5.
6
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
7
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
8
New guidance to improve sample size calculations for trials: eliciting the target difference.改善试验样本量计算的新指南:引出目标差异。
Trials. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2894-y.
9
Correction to: Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA2 guidance.对以下内容的勘误:为随机对照试验选择目标差异并进行和报告样本量计算——DELTA2指南的制定。
Trials. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3809-2.
10
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.

引用本文的文献

1
The NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) trial: a randomized controlled trial of microsurgical repair versus nerve alignment for digital nerve injury.NEON(神经是否修复)试验:一项关于指神经损伤显微外科修复与神经对合的随机对照试验。
Br J Surg. 2025 Sep 2;112(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf174.
2
Estimating a minimum clinically important difference for the Developmental Behaviour Checklist - parent report.评估《发育行为清单》家长报告的最小临床重要差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 15;16:1612911. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612911. eCollection 2025.
3
Data extraction error and its implications on systematic reviews in urology: a protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Choosing the target difference ('effect size') for a randomised controlled trial - DELTA guidance protocol.为随机对照试验选择目标差异(“效应量”)——DELTA指南方案。
Trials. 2017 Jun 12;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1969-5.
2
Estimands-new statistical principle or the emperor's new clothes?估计量——新的统计原则还是皇帝的新衣?
Pharm Stat. 2017 Jan;16(1):4-5. doi: 10.1002/pst.1792. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
3
Estimands in clinical trials - broadening the perspective.临床试验中的估计量——拓宽视角。
数据提取错误及其对泌尿外科系统评价的影响:一项方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2025 Jun 2;29(3):102-107. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000050. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
ExtraCECI: a community-based person-centred-enhanced care intervention to improve the quality of life and person-centred outcomes for people living with HIV/AIDS in Ghana-protocol for cluster randomised controlled trial.ExtraCECI:一项基于社区的以患者为中心的强化护理干预措施,旨在改善加纳艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的生活质量和以患者为中心的治疗效果——整群随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 23;15(5):e102692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102692.
5
Nalmefene effectively relieves thoracic epidural opioid-induced pruritus without affecting analgesia: a randomized controlled clinical trial.纳美芬可有效缓解胸段硬膜外阿片类药物引起的瘙痒且不影响镇痛效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):2028-2037. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1455. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
6
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述:随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
7
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.CONSORT 2025解释与阐述:随机对照试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081124. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081124.
8
Metformin treatment for patients with hand osteoarthritis: protocol for the multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled METRO trial.二甲双胍治疗手部骨关节炎患者:多中心、随机、安慰剂对照METRO试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 26;15(3):e093831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093831.
9
Continuous glucose monitor overestimates glycemia, with the magnitude of bias varying by postprandial test and individual - a randomized crossover trial.持续葡萄糖监测高估血糖水平,偏差幅度因餐后测试和个体而异——一项随机交叉试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 May;121(5):1025-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.024. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
10
Reporting of cluster randomised crossover trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration.整群随机交叉试验的报告:CONSORT 2010声明的扩展及解释与详述
BMJ. 2025 Jan 6;388:e080472. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080472.
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):5-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.7033. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Determination of the optimal sample size for a clinical trial accounting for the population size.考虑总体规模的临床试验最佳样本量的确定。
Biom J. 2017 Jul;59(4):609-625. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500228. Epub 2016 May 17.
5
Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group.估计量:来自PSI估计量与敏感性专家组的讨论要点
Pharm Stat. 2017 Jan;16(1):6-11. doi: 10.1002/pst.1745. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
6
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
7
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.随机对照试验中目标差值的指定方法:试验差值 elicitation(DELTA)系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001645. eCollection 2014 May.
8
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
9
Use of methods for specifying the target difference in randomised controlled trial sample size calculations: Two surveys of trialists' practice.随机对照试验样本量计算中指定目标差异方法的使用:对试验者实践的两项调查
Clin Trials. 2014 Jun;11(3):300-308. doi: 10.1177/1740774514521907. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.后路椎间盘镜手术与康复治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病伴下腰痛:随机研究两年随访
BMJ. 2011 May 19;342:d2786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2786.