Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Copenhagen,Denmark.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Dec;15(6):724-740. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000402. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Due to the multiple physical, psychological, existential, and social symptoms involved, patients with advanced cancer often have a reduced quality of life (QoL), which requires specialized palliative care (SPC) interventions. The primary objective of the present systematic review was to review the existing literature about SPC and its effect on QoL, on physical and psychological symptoms, and on survival in adult patients with advanced cancer.
We utilized a search strategy based on the PICO (problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) framework and employed terminology related to cancer, QoL, symptoms, mood, and palliative care. The search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Selected studies were analyzed and categorized according to methods, results, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation.
Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis (out of a total of 1,115 studies). Two other studies were found by hand search, one of which was only published in conference abstract form. The RCTs differed in terms of aims, interventions, control groups, and outcomes; however, the primary aim of all of them was to investigate the effect of SPC on patient QoL. Five studies found improved QoL in the intervention group. Physical symptom intensity decreased in two studies, and three studies found improved mood in the intervention group. However, physical and psychological symptoms were secondary outcomes in these studies. Survival was improved in two studies. All the studies offered generalizability, but the level of evidence validity varied among them.
Due to several methodological limitations, the evidence offered in these studies ranged from low to high. The evidence in this field of study in general is still nascent, but there is growing support for the utilization of SPC to improve the quality of life of adult patients with advanced cancer. The evidence that SPC reduces physical and psychological symptoms is moderate, while the evidence that it prolongs survival is low.
由于涉及多种身体、心理、存在和社会症状,晚期癌症患者的生活质量(QoL)往往会降低,这需要专门的姑息治疗(SPC)干预。本系统评价的主要目的是回顾关于 SPC 及其对晚期癌症成人患者 QoL、身体和心理症状以及生存的影响的现有文献。
我们采用了基于 PICO(问题/人群、干预、比较和结果)框架的搜索策略,并使用了与癌症、QoL、症状、情绪和姑息治疗相关的术语。在 Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中进行了搜索。根据方法、结果、证据质量和推荐强度对选定的研究进行了分析和分类。
共筛选出 6 项随机对照试验(RCT)进行分析(共 1115 项研究)。通过手工搜索还发现了另外 2 项研究,其中 1 项仅以会议摘要形式发表。这些 RCT 在目的、干预措施、对照组和结局方面存在差异;然而,它们的主要目的都是调查 SPC 对患者 QoL 的影响。有 5 项研究发现干预组的 QoL 得到了改善。2 项研究发现身体症状强度降低,3 项研究发现干预组的情绪得到改善。然而,这些研究中的身体和心理症状是次要结局。有 2 项研究发现生存得到改善。所有研究都具有普遍性,但证据有效性的水平在这些研究中各不相同。
由于存在一些方法学上的局限性,这些研究提供的证据质量从低到高不等。该研究领域的总体证据仍然处于萌芽阶段,但越来越多的人支持利用 SPC 来改善晚期癌症成人患者的生活质量。SPC 减轻身体和心理症状的证据是中等的,而它延长生存的证据是低的。