• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反流症状指数在变应性患者人群中用于诊断咽反流的效用。

The Utility of the Reflux Symptom Index for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in an Allergy Patient Population.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, Calif.

Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Diego, Calif.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):132-138.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.039. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.039
PMID:28606786
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is associated with asthma, vocal cord dysfunction, cough, postnasal drainage, and throat irritation. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a clinical tool to predict the presence of LPR, but a threshold RSI score has never been validated for the diagnosis of LPR in an allergic patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal threshold RSI score predictive of LPR in an allergy clinic population.

METHODS

The 9-question RSI questionnaire was administered to 84 patients in the Kaiser Permanente San Diego Allergy Department. The patient's allergist (who was blinded to the patient's RSI responses) was asked to determine whether the patient had symptoms consistent with LPR. Each subject's RSI score was then compared with a corresponding physician-based diagnosis. After determining the correlation between the subject's RSI score and physician-diagnosed LPR/supraesophageal reflux, a cutoff level above which LPR/supraesophageal reflux would be highly suspected was calculated on the basis of most optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity determined via a receiver-operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty of the 84 patients (36%) were diagnosed with LPR. The mean RSI score for the group without LPR was 18.3 ± 9.8 (out of 45 possible), while the LPR group's mean was 25.0 ± 8.3 (P < .01). The optimal RSI score cutoff was determined to be 19. An abbreviated questionnaire was also generated using 6 of the RSI questions found to be significantly different between patients with and without LPR.

CONCLUSIONS

An RSI score of 19 appears to represent the best threshold for predicting LPR in an allergy clinic patient population.

摘要

背景

喉咽反流(LPR)与哮喘、声带功能障碍、咳嗽、后鼻滴注和咽喉刺激有关。反流症状指数(RSI)是一种预测 LPR 存在的临床工具,但从未针对过敏患者人群中 LPR 的诊断验证过 RSI 评分的阈值。

目的

确定在过敏诊所人群中预测 LPR 的最佳 RSI 评分阈值。

方法

在 Kaiser Permanente San Diego Allergy Department,对 84 名患者进行了 9 个问题的 RSI 问卷。要求患者的过敏症专家(对患者的 RSI 反应不知情)确定患者是否有符合 LPR 的症状。然后将每个受试者的 RSI 评分与相应的医生基于诊断进行比较。在确定受试者的 RSI 评分与医生诊断的 LPR/食管上反流之间的相关性之后,基于通过接收者操作曲线分析确定的最佳灵敏度和特异性之间的平衡,计算出 LPR/食管上反流高度可疑的截断值。

结果

84 名患者中有 30 名(36%)被诊断为 LPR。无 LPR 组的平均 RSI 评分为 18.3 ± 9.8(满分 45 分),而 LPR 组的平均 RSI 评分为 25.0 ± 8.3(P<.01)。确定最佳 RSI 评分截断值为 19。还使用在有和无 LPR 的患者之间存在显著差异的 RSI 问题中的 6 个问题生成了一个简化问卷。

结论

RSI 评分 19 似乎代表了预测过敏诊所患者人群中 LPR 的最佳阈值。

相似文献

1
The Utility of the Reflux Symptom Index for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in an Allergy Patient Population.反流症状指数在变应性患者人群中用于诊断咽反流的效用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):132-138.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.039. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
2
Assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the Reflux Symptom Index: validation and prevalence in the Greek population.使用反流症状指数评估喉咽反流症状:希腊人群的验证和患病率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Dec;145(6):974-80. doi: 10.1177/0194599811425142. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Scale: Psychometric Properties using Optimal Scaling Techniques.反流症状指数(RSI)量表的评估与诊断准确性评价:运用最优尺度技术的心理测量特性
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Oct;129(10):1020-1029. doi: 10.1177/0003489420930034. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
[Application of reflux symptom index in diagnosis of allergic patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux].反流症状指数在变应性喉咽反流患者诊断中的应用
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov;32(22):1711-1713. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.22.007.
5
Low Antioxidant Enzyme Levels and Oxidative Stress in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) Patients.咽喉反流病(LPR)患者的抗氧化酶水平低和氧化应激。
J Voice. 2023 Nov;37(6):924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
6
Prevalence and clinical predictors of LPR among patients diagnosed with GERD according to the reflux symptom index questionnaire.根据反流症状指数问卷,在诊断为胃食管反流病的患者中喉咽反流的患病率及临床预测因素。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul-Aug;24(4):236-241. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_518_17.
7
Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom score.反流症状评分的有效性和可靠性。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Mar;130(3):E98-E107. doi: 10.1002/lary.28017. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
8
Linguistic Adaptation, Reliability, Validation, and Responsivity of the Chinese Version of Reflux Symptom Index.反流症状指数中文版的语言调适、信度、效度及反应度
J Voice. 2016 Jan;30(1):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.006. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
9
Detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with upper airways symptoms: Symptoms, signs or salivary pepsin?在上气道症状患者中检测喉咽反流:症状、体征还是唾液胃蛋白酶?
Respir Med. 2015 Aug;109(8):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 May 22.
10
The utility of narrow band imaging in endoscopic diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux.窄带成像技术在咽喉反流内镜诊断中的应用。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):715-719. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening Evaluation for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.喉咽反流病的筛查评估
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):2593-2594. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02286-x. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Clinical Implications of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Reflux Symptom Index in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.胃食管反流病问卷和反流症状指数在疑似喉咽反流症状患者中的临床意义
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Oct 30;28(4):599-607. doi: 10.5056/jnm21235.
3
Do Otolaryngologists Over- or Underestimate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Findings in Clinical Practice? A Comparison Study between the True Prevalence and the Otolaryngologist-Estimated Prevalence of Symptoms and Findings.
在临床实践中,耳鼻喉科医生对喉咽反流症状和体征的评估是高估还是低估了?症状和体征的实际患病率与耳鼻喉科医生估计患病率的比较研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 1;11(17):5192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175192.
4
Validation and Reliability of Polish Version of the Reflux Symptoms Index and Reflux Finding Score.波兰版反流症状指数和反流发现评分的效度与信度
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;10(8):1411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081411.
5
Using RSI and RFS scores to differentiate between reflux-related and other causes of chronic laryngitis.使用 RSI 和 RFS 评分来区分反流相关和其他慢性喉炎病因。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
6
Reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough complicated by laryngopharyngeal reflux.胃食管反流相关性慢性咳嗽合并喉咽反流患者的反流特征
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(20):529. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.162.