Suppr超能文献

ACPA 阳性和 ACPA 阴性 RA 前症状期的差异:进展为临床关节炎时关节痛的纵向研究。

Differences in the symptomatic phase preceding ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA: a longitudinal study in arthralgia during progression to clinical arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1751-1754. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211325. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive and ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have different aetiopathology, the clinical presentation at the time of diagnosis is similar. This study evaluated whether there are phenotypic differences in the symptomatic pre-RA phase.

METHODS

Patients with arthralgia included in the Leiden clinically suspect arthralgia cohort who developed arthritis during follow-up were studied (n=67). Symptoms at symptom onset, symptoms and signs at presentation with arthralgia and time to arthritis development were compared between ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients.

RESULTS

In ACPA-negative patients (n=37), the location of initial symptoms less often included the lower extremities (22% vs 50%, p=0.014). At presentation with arthralgia, ACPA-positive patients had a longer symptom duration (median 22 vs 14 weeks, p=0.005), less tender joints (mean 5 vs 9, p=0.007) and less difficulty making a fist (11% vs 43%, p=0.004). However, after presentation with arthralgia, ACPA-positive patients developed arthritis more quickly (median 6 vs 18 weeks, p=0.015). A partial least squares regression analysis showed clustering of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients based on the above-mentioned clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first showing that ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients have clinical differences in the symptomatic phase preceding clinical arthritis. This contributes to the notion that ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA develop differently.

摘要

目的

尽管抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)阳性和 ACPA 阴性类风湿关节炎(RA)具有不同的发病机制,但在诊断时的临床表现相似。本研究评估了在有症状的 RA 前期是否存在表型差异。

方法

研究了莱顿临床可疑关节炎队列中纳入的关节炎患者(n=67),这些患者在随访期间发展为关节炎。比较了 ACPA 阳性和 ACPA 阴性患者在症状发作时的症状、出现关节炎时的症状和体征以及发展为关节炎的时间。

结果

在 ACPA 阴性患者(n=37)中,初始症状的部位较少包括下肢(22% vs 50%,p=0.014)。在出现关节炎时,ACPA 阳性患者的症状持续时间更长(中位数 22 周 vs 14 周,p=0.005),压痛关节较少(平均 5 个 vs 9 个,p=0.007),握拳困难程度较轻(11% vs 43%,p=0.004)。然而,在出现关节炎后,ACPA 阳性患者更快地发展为关节炎(中位数 6 周 vs 18 周,p=0.015)。偏最小二乘回归分析显示,基于上述临床变量,ACPA 阳性和 ACPA 阴性患者聚类。

结论

本研究首次表明,在出现临床关节炎之前的有症状阶段,ACPA 阳性和 ACPA 阴性患者具有临床差异。这有助于理解 ACPA 阳性和 ACPA 阴性 RA 的发病机制不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验