Ballantyne Angela J
Senior Lecturer Bioethics, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2016 Jul 1;129(1437):64-70.
Pregnancy is a crucial window of time that influences long-term population health. As a matter of justice, pregnant woman are entitled to high quality, evidenced-based care. As a matter of population health, we need to better understand foetal development, particularly the impact of lifestyle, stress, chronic conditions and clinical treatment during pregnancy. Pregnancy continues to be dominated by the precautionary principle, advocating for the routine exclusion of pregnant women from medical research, particularly intervention studies, on the grounds of foetal vulnerability. But this stance simply shifts the risk into the community. Due to a lack of evidence-based data, many pregnant women are refused medically important drugs, are subject to dangerous delays in getting drugs, or are prescribed drugs that are thought 'safe', despite evidence of possible teratogenicity. I argue that New Zealand needs to shift to a default position of inclusion of pregnant women in research; and to develop guidelines to facilitate their safe and responsible inclusion. The uniqueness of pregnancy gives rise to specific questions regarding research ethics. These questions warrant focused debate and the answers cannot simply be deduced from the general principles of research ethics we currently have in New Zealand.
怀孕是影响长期人口健康的关键时期。从公正的角度来看,孕妇有权获得高质量的、基于证据的护理。从人口健康的角度来看,我们需要更好地了解胎儿发育,尤其是孕期生活方式、压力、慢性病和临床治疗的影响。怀孕仍然以预防原则为主导,主张基于胎儿的脆弱性,将孕妇常规排除在医学研究之外,特别是干预性研究。但这种立场只是将风险转移到了社区。由于缺乏基于证据的数据,许多孕妇被拒绝使用对医学很重要的药物,在获取药物时面临危险的延误,或者被开了被认为“安全”的药物,尽管有证据表明可能有致畸性。我认为新西兰需要转向将孕妇纳入研究的默认立场;并制定指导方针,以促进她们安全且负责任地被纳入研究。怀孕的独特性引发了有关研究伦理的特定问题。这些问题值得进行有针对性的辩论,答案不能简单地从我们新西兰目前的研究伦理一般原则中推导出来。