Kelty Erin, Hulse Gary
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Aug;46:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.039. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
Illicit opioid use is associated with high rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose. This study aims to compare rates of fatal and serious but non-fatal opioid overdose in opioid dependent patients treated with methadone, buprenorphine or implant naltrexone, and to identify risk factors for fatal opioid overdose.
Opioid dependent patients treated with methadone (n=3515), buprenorphine (n=3250) or implant naltrexone (n=1461) in Western Australia for the first time between 2001 and 2010, were matched against state mortality and hospital data. Rates of fatal and non-fatal serious opioid overdoses were calculated and compared for the three treatments. Risk factors associated with fatal opioid overdose were examined using multivariate cox proportional hazard models.
No significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of crude rates of fatal or non-fatal opioid overdoses. During the first 28days of treatment, rates of non-fatal opioid overdose were high in all three groups, as were fatal opioid overdoses in patients treated with methadone. However, no fatal opioid overdoses were observed in buprenorphine or naltrexone patients during this period. Following the first 28 days, buprenorphine was shown to be protective, particularly in terms of non-fatal opioid overdoses. After the cessation of treatment, rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdoses were similar between the groups, with the exception of lower rates of non-fatal opioid overdose in the naltrexone treated patients compared with the methadone treated patients. After the commencement of treatment, gender, and hospitalisations with a diagnosis of opioid poisoning, cardiovascular or mental health problems were significant predictors of subsequent fatal opioid overdose.
Rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose were not significantly different in patients treated with methadone, buprenorphine or implant naltrexone. Gender and prior cause-specific hospitalisations can be used to identify patients at a high risk of fatal opioid overdose.
非法使用阿片类药物与致命和非致命性阿片类药物过量的高发生率相关。本研究旨在比较接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮植入治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者中致命和严重但非致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率,并确定致命性阿片类药物过量的危险因素。
2001年至2010年间首次在西澳大利亚接受美沙酮治疗(n = 3515)、丁丙诺啡治疗(n = 3250)或纳曲酮植入治疗(n = 1461)的阿片类药物依赖患者,与该州的死亡率和医院数据进行匹配。计算并比较三种治疗方法中致命和非致命性严重阿片类药物过量的发生率。使用多变量考克斯比例风险模型检查与致命性阿片类药物过量相关的危险因素。
在致命或非致命性阿片类药物过量的粗发生率方面,三组之间未观察到显著差异。在治疗的前28天内,所有三组中非致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率都很高,接受美沙酮治疗的患者中致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率也很高。然而,在此期间,丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮治疗的患者中未观察到致命性阿片类药物过量。在最初的28天之后,丁丙诺啡显示出保护作用,特别是在非致命性阿片类药物过量方面。治疗停止后,各组之间致命和非致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率相似,但与接受美沙酮治疗的患者相比,接受纳曲酮治疗的患者中非致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率较低。治疗开始后,性别以及诊断为阿片类药物中毒、心血管或心理健康问题的住院治疗是随后致命性阿片类药物过量的重要预测因素。
接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮植入治疗的患者中,致命和非致命性阿片类药物过量的发生率没有显著差异。性别和先前特定病因的住院治疗可用于识别有致命性阿片类药物过量高风险的患者。