Domzaridou Eleni, Carr Matthew J, Webb Roger T, Millar Tim, Ashcroft Darren M
National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Aug 11;22:100489. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100489. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The initiation and cessation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) have both been associated with elevated risk of fatal overdose. We examined risk of non-fatal overdose during OAT initiation and cessation and specifically between methadone versus buprenorphine recipients.
We utilised primary care electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to delineate a study cohort of adults aged 18-64 who were prescribed OAT between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2017. These records were linked to hospitalisation, mortality records and patient neighbourhood and practice-level Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles. With inverse probability treatment weights applied and negative binomial regression models we estimated incidence rate ratios for hospital admissions among patients who experienced multiple overdoses.
A total of 20898 patients were prescribed methadone or buprenorphine over 83856 person-years of follow-up. Compared with periods in treatment, patients not in treatment were 51% more likely to experience a non-fatal overdose that required hospitalisation (weighted rate ratio, wRR 1·51; 95% CI 1·42, 1·60), especially during the four weeks of OAT initiation (5·59; 5·31, 5·89) and following cessation (13·39; 12·78, 14·03). The wRR of overdose during (0·37; 0·34, 0·39) and after treatment (0·36; 0·34, 0·38) favoured buprenorphine compared to methadone.
OAT is associated with decreased non-fatal overdose risk. Buprenorphine may act more protectively than methadone, especially during the first four weeks of treatment.
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC-2016-003).
阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的启动和终止均与致命性过量用药风险升高相关。我们研究了OAT启动和终止期间非致命性过量用药的风险,特别是美沙酮与丁丙诺啡接受者之间的风险。
我们利用临床实践研究数据链中的初级保健电子健康记录,划定了一个18至64岁成年人的研究队列,这些人在1998年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间接受了OAT治疗。这些记录与住院、死亡率记录以及患者社区和实践层面的多重剥夺指数五分位数相关联。通过应用逆概率治疗权重和负二项回归模型,我们估计了经历多次过量用药的患者住院的发病率比值。
在83856人年的随访中,共有20898名患者被开具了美沙酮或丁丙诺啡。与治疗期间相比,未接受治疗的患者发生需要住院治疗的非致命性过量用药的可能性高51%(加权比值比,wRR 1.51;95%可信区间1.42,1.60),尤其是在OAT启动的四周内(5.59;5.31,5.89)以及停药后(13.39;12.78,14.03)。与美沙酮相比,丁丙诺啡在治疗期间(0.37;0.34,0.39)和治疗后(0.36;0.34,0.38)的过量用药wRR更有利。
OAT与降低非致命性过量用药风险相关。丁丙诺啡可能比美沙酮具有更强的保护作用,尤其是在治疗的前四周。
国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)大曼彻斯特患者安全转化研究中心(PSTRC - 2016 - 003)。