School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Division of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020;46(2):241-250. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1698587. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
: Methadone, buprenorphine, and implant naltrexone have comparable efficacy in preventing death from drug intoxication during treatment, but there may be differences between treatments in the specific drugs contributing to death and in the risk of death during different phases of treatment.: The objective of this study was to compare concentrations of individual drugs in decedents for evidence that the three medications use to treat opioid use disorders differed in the protection they offered against fatal overdose.: Fatalities with a primary or co-diagnosis of alcohol or other drug poisoning in patients treated with methadone (n = 66, 74.2% male), buprenorphine (n = 54, 74.1% male), or naltrexone (n = 28, 85.7% male) were identified by combining treatment (Monitoring of Drugs of Dependence System and clinical records) and mortality records (Western Australian Death Registry). Quantitative postmortem blood drug analysis data were obtained for drug-related deaths. The presence/absence of drugs were compared between the three medication groups and between phases of treatment (on-treatment/off-treatment).: Opioids (89.8%) and benzodiazepines (76.2%) were most commonly identified in postmortem blood. The three medication groups did not differ materially in the drugs present postmortem, except that alcohol was less prevalent in naltrexone-treated cases. Morphine or heroin intoxication was implicated in more patients dying off-treatment than on-treatment but levels of morphine and other drugs were comparable across the two phases.: Comparisons of postmortem concentrations of specific drugs indicated that patients treated with methadone, buprenorphine, and implant naltrexone had comparable susceptibilities to lethal co-intoxication and that similar drug mixtures contributed to death.
美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮在治疗过程中预防药物中毒死亡的疗效相当,但在导致死亡的具体药物和治疗不同阶段的死亡风险方面,治疗方法之间可能存在差异。本研究的目的是比较死亡者个体药物的浓度,以证明用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的三种药物在提供预防致命药物过量方面存在差异。通过合并治疗(药物依赖监测系统和临床记录)和死亡率记录(西澳大利亚死亡登记处),确定了接受美沙酮(n=66,74.2%男性)、丁丙诺啡(n=54,74.1%男性)或纳曲酮(n=28,85.7%男性)治疗的患者中因主要或共诊断为酒精或其他药物中毒而死亡的病例。对与药物相关的死亡进行了定量死后血液药物分析数据。在三种药物组之间以及治疗阶段(治疗中/治疗后)之间比较了药物的存在/不存在情况。阿片类药物(89.8%)和苯二氮䓬类药物(76.2%)是死后血液中最常见的药物。除了纳曲酮治疗组中酒精较少外,三种药物组在死后存在的药物方面没有实质性差异。与治疗中相比,更多的患者在停药后因吗啡或海洛因中毒而死亡,但在两个阶段,吗啡和其他药物的水平相当。比较特定药物的死后浓度表明,接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和植入式纳曲酮治疗的患者对致命共中毒的敏感性相当,并且类似的药物混合物导致死亡。