a The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development (NUBU) , UNIRAND, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
Psychother Res. 2019 Feb;29(2):267-276. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1330574. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
The Working Alliance Inventory Short form (WAI-S) comprises 12 items that measure 3 subdomains (goal, task, and bond). In the present study, we evaluated the factor structure of WAI-S in a parent management training (PMT) context, by investigating a series of different factor models, including standard confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) models and more recent alternatives, like the exploratory structural equation model (ESEM), the bifactor-CFA, and the bifactor exploratory structural equation model (B-ESEM). The study sample consisted of 259 Norwegian parents receiving PMT - the Oregon model (PMTO). Alliance was rated by parents of children with emerging or present conduct problems after the first therapy session. Results showed that the B-ESEM model provided best model fit to the data. Estimated sources of variance and omega reliabilities supported a strong general alliance factor, but revealed poor quality of the specific factors. Overall, the present study implies that specific factors of working alliance should be interpreted with caution; rather one should rely on a general working alliance construct. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: Findings suggest that working alliance, as measured by WAI-S in a PMT context, is best reflected by a general construct that also take into account multidimensionality. However, only the general factors provide acceptable reliability. Consequently, practitioners should use the specific factors with caution. The indicators of the specific factors should be improved.
工作联盟量表简式(WAI-S)包含 12 个项目,用于衡量 3 个亚领域(目标、任务和纽带)。在本研究中,我们通过调查一系列不同的因素模型,包括标准验证性因素分析(CFA)模型和最近的替代模型,如探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)、双因素 CFA 和双因素探索性结构方程模型(B-ESEM),评估了 WAI-S 在父母管理培训(PMT)背景下的因素结构。研究样本由 259 名接受 PMT-俄勒冈模式(PMTO)的挪威父母组成。治疗的第一次治疗会议后,父母对孩子出现或存在的行为问题进行了联盟评估。结果表明,B-ESEM 模型为数据提供了最佳的模型拟合。估计的方差源和 omega 可靠性支持了一个强大的一般联盟因素,但也揭示了特定因素的质量较差。总体而言,本研究表明,工作联盟的特定因素的解释应该谨慎;而应该依赖于一般的工作联盟结构。本文的临床或方法学意义:研究结果表明,在 PMT 背景下,WAI-S 衡量的工作联盟最好由一个既能反映多维性又能反映多维性的一般结构来反映。然而,只有一般因素提供可接受的可靠性。因此,从业者应该谨慎使用特定因素。特定因素的指标应加以改进。