Chalmers Linda Maree, Ashton Toni, Tenbensel Tim
Auckland District Health Board, New Zealand.
University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):831-835. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
In July 2016, New Zealand introduced a new approach to measuring and monitoring health system performance. This 'Systems Level Measure Framework' (SLMF) has evolved from the Integrated Performance and Incentive Framework (IPIF) previously reported in this journal. The SLMF is designed to stimulate a 'whole of system' approach that requires inter-organisational collaboration. Local 'Alliances' between government and non-government health sector organisations are responsible for planning and achieving improved health system outcomes such as reducing ambulatory sensitive hospitalisation for young children, and reducing acute hospital bed days. It marks a shift from the previous regime of output and process targets, and from a pay-for-performance approach to primary care. Some elements of the earlier IPIF proposal, such as general practice quality measures, and tiered levels of performance, were not included in the SLM framework. The focus on health system outcomes demonstrates policy commitment to effective integration of health services. However, there remain considerable challenges to successful implementation. An outcomes framework makes it challenging to attribute changes in outcomes to organisational and collaborative strategies. At the local level, the strength and functioning of collaborative relationships between organisations vary considerably. The extent and pace of change may also be constrained by existing funding arrangements in the health system.
2016年7月,新西兰引入了一种衡量和监测卫生系统绩效的新方法。这种“系统层面衡量框架”(SLMF)是由本刊之前报道的综合绩效与激励框架(IPIF)演变而来的。SLMF旨在激发一种“全系统”方法,这种方法需要组织间的协作。政府与非政府卫生部门组织之间的地方“联盟”负责规划并实现改善卫生系统成果的目标,如减少幼儿非卧床敏感型住院情况,以及减少急性医院病床使用天数。这标志着从先前的产出和过程目标制度,以及从初级保健的绩效付费方法的转变。早期IPIF提案的一些要素,如全科医疗质量措施和绩效分层,未被纳入SLM框架。对卫生系统成果的关注体现了对有效整合卫生服务的政策承诺。然而,成功实施仍面临相当大的挑战。一个成果框架使得将成果变化归因于组织和协作战略具有挑战性。在地方层面,组织间协作关系的强度和运作差异很大。变革的程度和速度也可能受到卫生系统现有资金安排的限制。