Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; Birmingham University Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:388-399. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
Post-stimulus undershoots, negative responses following cessation of stimulation, are widely observed in functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) data. However, the debate surrounding whether the origin of this response phase is neuronal or vascular, and whether it provides functionally relevant information, that is additional to what is contained in the primary response, means that undershoots are widely overlooked. We simultaneously recorded electroencephalography (EEG), BOLD and cerebral blood-flow (CBF) [obtained from arterial spin labelled (ASL) fMRI] fMRI responses to hemifield checkerboard stimulation to test the potential neural origin of the fMRI post-stimulus undershoot. The post-stimulus BOLD and CBF signal amplitudes in both contralateral and ipsilateral visual cortex depended on the post-stimulus power of the occipital 8-13Hz (alpha) EEG neuronal activity, such that trials with highest EEG power showed largest fMRI undershoots in contralateral visual cortex. This correlation in post-stimulus EEG-fMRI responses was not predicted by the primary response amplitude. In the contralateral visual cortex we observed a decrease in both cerebral rate of oxygen metabolism (CMRO) and CBF during the post-stimulus phase. In addition, the coupling ratio (n) between CMRO and CBF was significantly lower during the positive contralateral primary response phase compared with the post-stimulus phase and we propose that this reflects an altered balance of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity. Together our data provide strong evidence that the post-stimulus phase of the BOLD response has a neural origin which reflects, at least partially, an uncoupling of the neuronal responses driving the primary and post-stimulus responses, explaining the uncoupling of the signals measured in the two response phases. We suggest our results are consistent with inhibitory processes driving the post-stimulus EEG and fMRI responses. We therefore propose that new methods are required to model the post-stimulus and primary responses independently, enabling separate investigation of response phases in cognitive function and neurological disease.
刺激后欠冲,即刺激停止后出现的负响应,在功能磁共振(fMRI)血氧水平依赖(BOLD)数据中广泛观察到。然而,关于该响应阶段的起源是神经元还是血管,以及它是否提供了除主要响应中包含的信息之外的功能相关信息的争论,意味着欠冲被广泛忽视。我们同时记录了脑电图(EEG)、BOLD 和脑血流(CBF)[通过动脉自旋标记(ASL)fMRI 获得]对视野棋盘刺激的 fMRI 响应,以测试 fMRI 刺激后欠冲的潜在神经起源。对侧和同侧视皮层的刺激后 BOLD 和 CBF 信号幅度取决于枕部 8-13Hz(alpha)EEG 神经元活动的刺激后功率,因此具有最高 EEG 功率的试验在对侧视皮层中表现出最大的 fMRI 欠冲。这种刺激后 EEG-fMRI 响应之间的相关性不能通过主要响应幅度来预测。在对侧视皮层中,我们观察到刺激后阶段脑氧代谢率(CMRO)和 CBF 均降低。此外,在正侧主要响应阶段与刺激后阶段相比,CMRO 和 CBF 之间的耦合比(n)显著降低,我们提出这反映了兴奋性和抑制性神经元活动平衡的改变。我们的数据提供了强有力的证据,表明 BOLD 响应的刺激后阶段具有神经起源,至少部分反映了驱动主要和刺激后响应的神经元响应的解耦,解释了在两个响应阶段测量的信号的解耦。我们建议我们的结果与驱动刺激后 EEG 和 fMRI 响应的抑制过程一致。因此,我们提出需要新的方法来独立地对刺激后和主要响应进行建模,从而能够在认知功能和神经疾病中分别研究响应阶段。