Hoffmann M, Kalkstein H, Volger I
Z Klin Psychol Psychother. 1978;26(1):23-33.
This study is the result of an attempt to get effective methods in order to reduce the students' speaking anxiety in seminars. In a prepost-design, two training programs are compared: systematic desensitization and assertive training. Success is controlled with the help of a subjective anxiety scale, the "Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar" (FPI), and by scanning how often and how long somebody is speaking in a seminar. The main results are: both of the training programs reduce speaking anxiety signficantly (perhaps with a little more success of SD), SD also reduces "Gehemmtheit" (FPI-Scale 8). There is a lot of difficulties with regard to the observation of the behavior variables but it seems to be that Ass increases speaking frequency in relation to the groups' mean, while this effect could not be supposed according to SD. At the end of the article, the results are discussed and some questions are raised with regard to the further research of training programs.
本研究旨在探寻有效方法以降低学生在研讨会上的发言焦虑。采用前后测设计,对两种训练方案进行比较:系统脱敏疗法和自信训练。借助主观焦虑量表“弗莱堡人格问卷”(FPI)以及记录研讨会上某人发言的频率和时长来衡量训练效果。主要结果如下:两种训练方案均能显著降低发言焦虑(或许系统脱敏疗法的效果稍好一些),系统脱敏疗法还能降低“拘谨性”(FPI量表8)。在行为变量观察方面存在诸多困难,但似乎自信训练相对于小组平均水平能提高发言频率,而系统脱敏疗法未呈现此效果。文章结尾对研究结果进行了讨论,并就训练方案的进一步研究提出了一些问题。