• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非麻醉专业人员在非高级胃肠道内镜检查中给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Safety of non-anesthesia provider administered propofol sedation in non-advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gouda Basavana, Gouda Gowri, Borle Anuradha, Singh Akash, Sinha Ashish, Singh Preet M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Anesthesia, All Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 May-Jun;23(3):133-143. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_501_16.

DOI:10.4103/sjg.SJG_501_16
PMID:28611336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5470372/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of non-anesthesia provider (NAPP) administered propofol sedation in patients undergoing non-advanced gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for prospective observational trials involving non-advanced endoscopic procedures. From a total of 608 publications, 25 [colonoscopy (9), upper GI endoscopy (5), and combined procedures (11)] were identified to meet inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Data was analyzed for hypoxia rates, airway intervention rates, and airway complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 137,087 patients were involved. A total of 2931 hypoxia episodes (defined as an oxygen saturation below 90%) were reported with a pooled hypoxia rate of 0.014 (95% CI being 0.008-0.023). Similarly, pooled airway intervention rates and pooled airway complication rates were 0.002 (95% CI being 0.006-0.001) and 0.001 (95% CI being 0.000-0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of adverse events in patients undergoing non-advanced GI endoscopic procedures with NAPP sedation are extremely small. Similar data for anesthesia providers is not available. It is prudent for anesthesia providers to demonstrate their superiority in prospective randomized controlled trials, if they like to retain exclusive ownership over propofol sedation in patients undergoing GI endoscopy.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估在非高级胃肠道(GI)内镜检查过程中,由非麻醉专业人员(NAPP)给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性。

材料与方法

检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,以查找涉及非高级内镜检查的前瞻性观察性试验。从总共608篇出版物中,确定了25篇[结肠镜检查(9篇)、上消化道内镜检查(5篇)和联合手术(11篇)]符合纳入标准并进行分析。分析了低氧血症发生率、气道干预率和气道并发症发生率的数据。

结果

总共纳入了137,087例患者。共报告了2931次低氧血症发作(定义为氧饱和度低于90%),汇总低氧血症发生率为0.014(95%置信区间为0.008 - 0.023)。同样,汇总气道干预率和汇总气道并发症发生率分别为0.002(95%置信区间为0.006 - 0.001)和0.001(95%置信区间为0.000 - 0.001)。

结论

在接受非高级GI内镜检查并采用NAPP镇静的患者中,不良事件发生率极低。目前尚无麻醉专业人员的类似数据。如果麻醉专业人员希望在接受GI内镜检查的患者中保留丙泊酚镇静的独占权,那么在进行前瞻性随机对照试验中证明其优越性是明智的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/d8b17f26ff66/SJG-23-133-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/39eb7b6f060c/SJG-23-133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/54e499ceb344/SJG-23-133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/75f7934600dc/SJG-23-133-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/d8b17f26ff66/SJG-23-133-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/39eb7b6f060c/SJG-23-133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/54e499ceb344/SJG-23-133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/75f7934600dc/SJG-23-133-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cbe/5470372/d8b17f26ff66/SJG-23-133-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of non-anesthesia provider administered propofol sedation in non-advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A meta-analysis.非麻醉专业人员在非高级胃肠道内镜检查中给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 May-Jun;23(3):133-143. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_501_16.
2
Safety of Non-anesthesia Provider-Administered Propofol (NAAP) Sedation in Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures: Comparative Meta-Analysis of Pooled Results.非麻醉专业人员实施丙泊酚(NAAP)镇静在高级胃肠道内镜手术中的安全性:汇总结果的比较荟萃分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2612-27. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3608-x. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
3
Similar Risk of Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events Between Propofol and Traditional Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.丙泊酚与传统麻醉在胃肠镜检查中心血管不良事件风险相似:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;15(2):194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study.使用丙泊酚靶控输注进行胃肠内镜检查的深度镇静:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01103-w.
5
Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures.肥胖作为丙泊酚镇静下高级内镜检查期间镇静相关并发症的危险因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1238-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.006.
6
Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for advanced endoscopic procedures: a meta-analysis.异丙酚与传统镇静剂在先进内镜检查中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jul;26(4):515-24. doi: 10.1111/den.12219. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
7
The Comparison of Etomidate and Propofol Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.依托咪酯与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查患者麻醉的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000373.
8
Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.胃肠道内镜检查的麻醉
Anesthesiol Clin. 2009 Mar;27(1):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2008.10.004.
9
Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study.门诊上消化道内镜检查中丙泊酚合适输注速率的确定——一项随机前瞻性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 26;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0463-y.
10
Airway Management During Upper GI Endoscopic Procedures: State of the Art Review.上消化道内镜检查术中的气道管理:最新综述
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4375-z. Epub 2016 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Use of Remimazolam and Ciprofol Reduces Hypoxemia and Shortens Recovery Time During Sedated Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.瑞米唑仑与丙泊酚联合使用可减少镇静状态下胃肠内镜检查期间的低氧血症并缩短恢复时间。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 May 6;19:3703-3713. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S515783. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine-Propofol versus Ketamine-Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study.在小儿心脏导管插入术镇静过程中使用脑电双频指数(BIS)监测比较右美托咪定-丙泊酚与氯胺酮-丙泊酚恢复意识的前瞻性随机研究
Ann Card Anaesth. 2025 Jan 1;28(1):33-38. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_19_24. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
More Questions Than Answers: Comparison of the Risk of Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events Between Propofol and Traditional Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.问题多于答案:丙泊酚与传统麻醉用于胃肠内镜检查时心肺不良事件风险的比较
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):468. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.137. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
2
Forward Progress of Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Requires Taking a Step Back.胃肠内镜检查镇静的进展需要退后一步。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):562-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.091. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
3
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia.
瑞马唑仑及其在当前程序性镇静和全身麻醉领域中的地位。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154362.
4
Effect of remimazolam tosilate on the incidence of hypoxemia in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: A bi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑对老年患者行胃肠内镜检查时低氧血症发生率的影响:一项双中心、前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1131391. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1131391. eCollection 2023.
5
Effect of Remimazolam Tosilate on Respiratory Depression in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastroscopy: A Multicentered, Prospective, and Randomized Study.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑对老年胃镜检查患者呼吸抑制的影响:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机研究。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Dec 5;16:4151-4159. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S391147. eCollection 2022.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of colonoscopies in overweight and obese patients: Results from a national database on gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes.超重和肥胖患者结肠镜检查的有效性和耐受性:来自全国胃肠内镜检查结果数据库的结果。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E311-E320. doi: 10.1055/a-1672-3525. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Factors Associated with Withdrawal Time in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.欧洲结肠镜检查实践中与退镜时间相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组的研究结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;12(2):503. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020503.
8
Risk of adverse events in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Zero-inflated Poisson regression mixture model for count data and multinomial logit model for the type of event.胃肠内镜不良事件风险:计数资料零膨胀泊松回归混合模型和事件类型的多项逻辑回归模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 30;16(6):e0253515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253515. eCollection 2021.
9
Impact of endoscopic sedation on gastric polyp detection: A one-center retrospective observational study.内镜下镇静对胃息肉检测的影响:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 9;99(41):e22556. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022556.
10
Attitudes of anesthetists towards an anesthesia-led nurse practitioner model for low-risk colonoscopy procedures: a cross-sectional survey.麻醉师对低风险结肠镜检查中麻醉主导的护士执业模式的态度:一项横断面调查。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Mar 17;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-0458-1.
多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years' Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA.镇静类型与胃肠内镜检查相关不良事件之间的关联:来自美国一家三级中心的5年数据分析
Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar;50(2):161-169. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.019. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
5
Providing Deep Sedation for Advanced Endoscopic Procedures: The Esthetics of Endoscopic Anesthetics.为高级内镜手术提供深度镇静:内镜麻醉的美学
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jun;61(6):1426-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4157-7.
6
Cardiac arrests in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: A retrospective analysis of 73,029 procedures.接受胃肠内镜检查患者的心脏骤停:对73029例手术的回顾性分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):400-11. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.164202.
7
Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline--Updated June 2015.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚进行胃肠内镜检查:欧洲胃肠内镜学会、欧洲胃肠病学与内镜护理及相关人员学会指南——2015年6月更新
Endoscopy. 2015 Dec;47(12):1175-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393414. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Safety of Non-anesthesia Provider-Administered Propofol (NAAP) Sedation in Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures: Comparative Meta-Analysis of Pooled Results.非麻醉专业人员实施丙泊酚(NAAP)镇静在高级胃肠道内镜手术中的安全性:汇总结果的比较荟萃分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2612-27. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3608-x. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
9
International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010.2010年美国与欧洲婴儿死亡率及相关因素的国际比较
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014 Sep 24;63(5):1-6.
10
Remimazolam: The future of its sedative potential.瑞米唑仑:其镇静潜力的未来。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;8(3):388-91. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.136627.