Ghomraoui Firas A, Alotaibi Sami T, Alharthi Meshal A, Asiri Saeed S, Almadi Majid A, Alharbi Othman R, Azzam Nahla A, Aljebreen Abdulrahman M, Saeed Maria, Hajkhder Baraa, Saeed Waleed, Alzoghaibi Mohammad A
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology and 5Department of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 May-Jun;23(3):199-205. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_575_16.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ghrelin and leptin are thought to play a role in the loss of appetite in active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study seeks to probe into the association of these markers with regards to IBD and the nutritional status of these patients. A case-control study was conducted between May 2015 and March 2016 at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH). Thirty-one patients with IBD (both active and non-active) and forty-one healthy controls (both non-fasting and fasting) were recruited.
Plasma ghrelin and leptin levels were determined using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique. The nutritional status was determined through the standardized Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire.
The difference in the plasma ghrelin between active (263.7 pg/mL) and non-active (108 pg/mL) cases was significant (P= 0.02). The difference in mean plasma leptin level between active cases (229.4 pg/mL) vs. non-active cases (359.7 pg/mL) was insignificant (P= 0.4). In fasting (2028.6 pg/mL) and non-fasting controls (438.8 pg/mL), the mean plasma ghrelin values was significantly different (P< 0.01). In contrast, the plasma leptin level difference between fasting (727.3 pg/mL) and non-fasting (577 pg/mL) controls was insignificant (P= 0.14). There is a statistically significant association in mean ghrelin levels between the case group and the control group (P< 0.01). With regards to nutritional status, the mean MNA score of active cases compared to fasting controls was 18.8 ± 5 vs. 20.8 ± 3.8, respectively (P< 0.01) Conclusion: Ghrelin levels were lower in the active IBD cases compared to the inactive ones, signifying an underlying pathology as etiology to this phenomenon. Furthermore, ghrelin levels were significantly lower in both case groups compared to the controls. These findings, along with the disparity in the MNA scores, insinuate a possible link between hormone levels and the loss of appetite from which these patients suffer.
背景/目的:胃饥饿素和瘦素被认为在活动性炎症性肠病(IBD)的食欲减退中起作用。本研究旨在探讨这些标志物与IBD及其患者营养状况之间的关联。2015年5月至2016年3月在哈立德国王大学医院(KKUH)进行了一项病例对照研究。招募了31例IBD患者(包括活动期和非活动期)和41名健康对照者(包括非空腹和空腹)。
采用酶免疫分析(EIA)技术测定血浆胃饥饿素和瘦素水平。通过标准化的微型营养评定(MNA)问卷确定营养状况。
活动期(263.7 pg/mL)和非活动期(108 pg/mL)病例的血浆胃饥饿素差异显著(P = 0.02)。活动期病例(229.4 pg/mL)与非活动期病例(359.7 pg/mL)的平均血浆瘦素水平差异不显著(P = 0.4)。在空腹(2028.6 pg/mL)和非空腹对照者(438.8 pg/mL)中,平均血浆胃饥饿素值差异显著(P < 0.01)。相比之下,空腹(727.3 pg/mL)和非空腹(577 pg/mL)对照者之间的血浆瘦素水平差异不显著(P = 0.14)。病例组和对照组之间的平均胃饥饿素水平存在统计学显著关联(P < 0.01)。关于营养状况,活动期病例与空腹对照者的平均MNA评分分别为18.8±5和20.8±3.8(P < 0.01)。结论:与非活动期IBD病例相比,活动期病例的胃饥饿素水平较低,表明这种现象的潜在病理是病因。此外,两个病例组的胃饥饿素水平均显著低于对照组。这些发现,连同MNA评分的差异,暗示了激素水平与这些患者所遭受的食欲减退之间可能存在联系。