Öllinger Michael, von Müller Albrecht
Parmenides Center for the Study of ThinkingPullach, Germany.
Psychological Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunich, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00827. eCollection 2017.
Coherence-building is a key concept for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of intuition and insight problem solving. There are several accounts that address certain aspects of coherence-building. However, there is still no proper framework defining the general principles of coherence-building. We propose a four-stage model of coherence-building. The first stage starts with spreading activation restricted by constraints. This dynamic is a well-defined rule based process. The second stage is characterized by detecting a coherent state. We adopted a fluency account assuming that the ease of information processing indicates the realization of a coherent state. The third stage is designated to evaluate the result of the coherence-building process and assess whether the given problem is solved or not. If the coherent state does not fit the requirements of the task, the process re-enters at stage 1. These three stages characterize intuition. For insight problem solving a fourth stage is necessary, which restructures the given representation after repeated failure, so that a new search space results. The new search space enables new coherent states. We provide a review of the most important findings, outline our model, present a large number of examples, deduce potential new paradigms and measures that might help to decipher the underlying cognitive processes.
建立连贯性是更好地理解直觉和解决顿悟问题的潜在机制的关键概念。有几种观点涉及到建立连贯性的某些方面。然而,仍然没有一个合适的框架来定义建立连贯性的一般原则。我们提出了一个建立连贯性的四阶段模型。第一阶段始于受约束限制的扩散激活。这种动态是一个基于明确规则的过程。第二阶段的特征是检测到一个连贯状态。我们采用了流畅性观点,假设信息处理的难易程度表明连贯状态的实现。第三阶段用于评估建立连贯性过程的结果,并评估给定问题是否得到解决。如果连贯状态不符合任务要求,过程将重新进入第一阶段。这三个阶段构成了直觉。对于解决顿悟问题,需要第四阶段,即在多次失败后重新构建给定的表征,从而产生一个新的搜索空间。新的搜索空间能够产生新的连贯状态。我们对最重要的研究结果进行了综述,概述了我们的模型,给出了大量例子,推导了可能有助于解读潜在认知过程的新范式和新方法。