• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度医疗服务的去中心化:障碍与促进因素

Decentralization of health services in India: barriers and facilitating factors.

作者信息

Kaur Manmeet, Prinja Shankar, Singh Pravin K, Kumar Rajesh

机构信息

School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Health, Panchkula, Haryana, India.

出版信息

WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;1(1):94-104. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.206920.

DOI:10.4103/2224-3151.206920
PMID:28612783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In India, the process of decentralization of health services started taking shape in the mid-1990s. Systemic reforms envisaged delegation of administrative and financial responsibilities at district level for management of health-care institutions in 23 states of India in 1999. Subsequently, some of these reforms became part of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) launched in 2005. This study aims to document the process of decentralization in health services with special reference to the barriers and facilitating factors encountered during formulation and implementation of reform policies.

METHODS

Secondary data were reviewed, health facilities were observed, and semi-structured interviews of the key actors involved in decentralization were carried out in Haryana (India).

RESULTS

Political and bureaucratic commitment to reforms was found to be the most important facilitating factor. Orientation training on decentralized administrative structures and performance-based resource distribution were the other important facilitators. Structural changes in administrative procedures led to improvement in the financial management system. Significant improvement in the public health infrastructure was observed. From 2004 to 2008, the state government increased the budget of health sector by nearly 60%. Frequent changes in the top administration at the state level hampered the decentralization process. Districts having a dynamic administrative leadership implemented decentralization more effectively than the rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Decentralization of financial resources has improved the functioning of health services to some extent. Major policy decisions on decentralization of human resource management, increase in financial allocation, and greater involvement of community in decision-making are required.

摘要

背景

在印度,卫生服务的权力下放进程始于20世纪90年代中期。1999年,系统性改革设想将印度23个邦的行政和财政责任下放至地区层面,以管理医疗机构。随后,其中一些改革成为了2005年启动的国家农村卫生使命(NRHM)的一部分。本研究旨在记录卫生服务权力下放的过程,特别提及改革政策制定和实施过程中遇到的障碍和促进因素。

方法

回顾了二手数据,观察了卫生设施,并在印度哈里亚纳邦对参与权力下放的关键行为者进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

发现政治和官僚对改革的承诺是最重要的促进因素。关于分权行政结构和基于绩效的资源分配的定向培训是其他重要的促进因素。行政程序的结构性变化导致财务管理系统得到改善。公共卫生基础设施有了显著改善。从2004年到2008年,邦政府将卫生部门的预算增加了近60%。邦一级高层行政人员的频繁变动阻碍了权力下放进程。拥有充满活力的行政领导的地区比其他地区更有效地实施了权力下放。

结论

财政资源的权力下放已在一定程度上改善了卫生服务的运作。需要就人力资源管理权力下放、增加财政拨款以及社区更多地参与决策做出重大政策决定。

相似文献

1
Decentralization of health services in India: barriers and facilitating factors.印度医疗服务的去中心化:障碍与促进因素
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;1(1):94-104. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.206920.
2
Decentralization and decision space in the health sector: a case study from Karnataka, India.卫生部门的权力下放与决策空间:来自印度卡纳塔克邦的案例研究
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):171-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv034. Epub 2015 May 12.
3
Attitudes and perceptions of stakeholders on decentralization of health services in Uganda: the case of Lira and Apac districts.乌干达利益相关者对卫生服务分权的态度和看法:以利拉区和阿帕克区为例
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S8-11.
4
Municipal health services provision by local governments: a systematic review of experiences in decentralized Sub-Saharan African countries.地方政府提供城市卫生服务:分散的撒哈拉以南非洲国家经验的系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(9):1327-1336. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx082.
5
Improving health services in India: a different perspective.改善印度的医疗服务:一个不同的视角。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):1002-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1002.
6
Decentralization and health system performance - a focused review of dimensions, difficulties, and derivatives in India.权力下放与卫生系统绩效——对印度的维度、困难及衍生问题的重点综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 6):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1784-9.
7
Challenges to the implementation of health sector decentralization in Tanzania: experiences from Kongwa district council.坦桑尼亚卫生部门权力下放实施面临的挑战:来自孔戈瓦区议会的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Aug 29;6:20983. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20983.
8
Maternal and child health services in India with special focus on perinatal services.印度的母婴健康服务,特别关注围产期服务。
J Perinatol. 1997 Jan-Feb;17(1):65-9.
9
Decentralization and primary health care: some negative implications in developing countries.权力下放与初级卫生保健:发展中国家的一些负面影响
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(3):459-75. doi: 10.2190/G1XJ-PX06-1LVD-2FXQ.
10
Decentralization in India's health sector: insights from a capacity building intervention in Karnataka.印度卫生部门的权力下放:来自卡纳塔克邦能力建设干预的见解。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):595-604. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz081.

引用本文的文献

1
National Rural Health Mission reforms in light of decentralised planning in Kerala, India: a realist analysis of data from three witness seminars.印度喀拉拉邦分权规划视角下的国家农村卫生使命改革:来自三个见证研讨会的现实主义分析数据
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18181-x.
2
Tracking health sector priority setting processes and outcomes for human resources for health, five-years after political devolution: a county-level case study in Kenya.追踪卫生部门人力资源优先事项设定过程和结果:肯尼亚县级案例研究,政治权力下放五年后。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 21;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01284-3.
3
Costing for universal health coverage: insight into essential economic data from three provinces in Cambodia.
全民健康覆盖的成本核算:洞察柬埔寨三个省份的基本经济数据。
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Oct 30;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0246-6.
4
Utilization of Intergovernmental Funds to Implement Maternal and Child Health Plans of a Multi-Strategy Community Intervention in Haryana, North India: A Retrospective Assessment.利用政府间基金实施印度北部哈里亚纳邦多策略社区干预的母婴健康计划:一项回顾性评估
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Dec;1(4):265-278. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0026-3.
5
Local self governance in health - a study of it's functioning in Odisha, India.卫生领域的地方自治——对其在印度奥里萨邦运作情况的一项研究。 (注:原句中“it's”应改为“its”)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 6):554. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1785-8.
6
Economic analysis of delivering primary health care services through community health workers in 3 North Indian states.印度北部3个邦通过社区卫生工作者提供初级卫生保健服务的经济分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091781. eCollection 2014.