David J-S, Voiglio E-J, Cesareo E, Vassal O, Decullier E, Gueugniaud P-Y, Peyrefitte S, Tazarourte K
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon-Sud Hospital, Pierre Bénite, France.
Lyon Est School of Medicine, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Vox Sang. 2017 Aug;112(6):557-566. doi: 10.1111/vox.12545. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of prehospital parameters, including vital signs and resuscitation (fluids, vasopressor), to predict trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC, fibrinogen <1·5 g/l or PT > 1·5 or platelet count <100 × 10 /l), and a massive transfusion (MT, ≥10 RBC units within the first 24 h).
From a trauma registry (2011-2015), in which patients are prospectively included, we retrospectively retrieved the heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), volume of prehospital fluids and administration of noradrenaline. We calculated the shock index (SI: HR/SBP), the MGAP prehospital triage score and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). We also identified patients who had positive criteria from the Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (ROC, SBP < 70 mmHg or SBP 70-90 and HR > 107 pulse/min). For these parameters, we drew a ROC curve and defined a cut-off value to predict TIC or MT. The strength of association between prehospital parameters and TIC as well as MT was assessed using logistic regression, and cut-off values were determined using ROC curves.
Among the 485 patients included in the study, TIC was observed in 112 patients (23%) and MT in 22 patients (5%). For the prediction of TIC, ISS had good accuracy (AUC: 0·844, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0·799-0·879), as did the volume of fluids (>1000 ml) given during prehospital care (AUC: 0·801, 95% CI: 0·752-0·842). For the prediction of MT, ISS had excellent accuracy (AUC: 0·932, 95% CI: 0·866-0·966), whereas good accuracy was found for SI (> 0·9; AUC: 0·859, 95% CI: 0·705-0·936), vasopressor administration (AUC: 0·828, 95% CI: 0·736-0·890) and fluids (>1000 ml; AUC: 0·811, 95% CI: 0·737-0·867). Vasopressor administration, ISS and SI were independent predictors of TIC and MT, whereas fluid volume and ROC criteria were independent predictor of TIC but not MT. No independent relationship was found between MGAP and TIC or MT.
Prehospital parameters including the SI and resuscitation may help to better identify the severity of bleeding in trauma patients and the need for blood product administration at admission.
本研究旨在评估院前参数(包括生命体征和复苏情况[液体、血管加压药])预测创伤性凝血病(TIC,纤维蛋白原<1.5 g/L或PT>1.5或血小板计数<100×10⁹/L)及大量输血(MT,在最初24小时内≥10个红细胞单位)的准确性。
从一个前瞻性纳入患者的创伤登记系统(2011 - 2015年)中,我们回顾性获取心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、院前液体量及去甲肾上腺素的使用情况。我们计算了休克指数(SI:HR/SBP)、MGAP院前分诊评分及损伤严重度评分(ISS)。我们还确定了符合复苏结果联盟(ROC,SBP<70 mmHg或SBP 70 - 90且HR>107次/分钟)阳性标准的患者。对于这些参数,我们绘制了ROC曲线并确定一个临界值以预测TIC或MT。使用逻辑回归评估院前参数与TIC以及MT之间的关联强度,并使用ROC曲线确定临界值。
在纳入研究的485例患者中,112例(23%)观察到TIC,22例(5%)观察到MT。对于TIC的预测,ISS具有良好的准确性(AUC:0.844,95%置信区间,CI:0.799 - 0.879),院前护理期间给予的液体量(>1000 ml)也是如此(AUC:0.801,95% CI:0.752 - 0.842)。对于MT的预测,ISS具有优异的准确性(AUC:0.932,95% CI:0.866 - 0.966),而SI(>0.9;AUC:0.859,95% CI:0.705 - 0.936)、血管加压药的使用(AUC:0.828,95% CI:0.736 - 0.890)及液体量(>1000 ml;AUC:0.811,95% CI:0.737 - 0.867)具有良好的准确性。血管加压药的使用、ISS和SI是TIC和MT的独立预测因素,而液体量和ROC标准是TIC的独立预测因素,但不是MT的独立预测因素。未发现MGAP与TIC或MT之间存在独立关系。
包括SI和复苏情况在内的院前参数可能有助于更好地识别创伤患者出血的严重程度以及入院时输血制品的需求。