• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者休克指数预测大量输血和死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2023 Mar 5;27(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w
PMID:36872322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of bleeding trauma patients is still a difficult challenge. Massive transfusion (MT) requires resources to ensure the safety and timely delivery of blood products. Early prediction of MT need may be useful to shorten the time process of blood product preparation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of shock index to predict the need for MT in adult patients with trauma. For the same population, we also assessed the accuracy of SI to predict mortality.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 2022. Studies were included if they reported MT or mortality with SI recorded at arrival in the field or the emergency department. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, for a total of 670,728 patients. For MT the overall sensibility was 0.68 [0.57; 0.76], the overall specificity was 0.84 [0.79; 0.88] and the AUC was 0.85 [0.81; 0.88]. Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR+; LR-) were 4.24 [3.18-5.65] and 0.39 [0.29-0.52], respectively. For mortality the overall sensibility was 0.358 [0.238; 0.498] the overall specificity 0.742 [0.656; 0.813] and the AUC 0.553 (confidence region for sensitivity given specificity: [0.4014; 0.6759]; confidence region for specificity given sensitivity: [0.4799; 0.6332]). LR+ and LR- were 1.39 [1.36-1.42] and 0.87 [0.85-0.89], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that SI may have a limited role as the sole tool to predict the need for MT in adult trauma patients. SI is not accurate to predict mortality but may have a role to identify patients with a low risk of mortality.

摘要

背景

创伤患者出血的管理仍然是一个具有挑战性的难题。大量输血(MT)需要资源来确保血液制品的安全和及时供应。早期预测 MT 的需求可能有助于缩短血液制品准备的时间过程。本研究的主要目的是评估休克指数(SI)预测成人创伤患者 MT 需求的准确性。对于同一人群,我们还评估了 SI 预测死亡率的准确性。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析按照 PRISMA 指南进行。我们在 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统搜索,检索时间从开始到 2022 年 3 月。如果研究报告了 SI 记录在现场或急诊室到达时的 MT 或死亡率,则纳入研究。使用 QUADAS-2 评估偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入 35 项系统评价和荟萃分析,共纳入 670728 例患者。对于 MT,总体敏感性为 0.68 [0.57;0.76],总体特异性为 0.84 [0.79;0.88],AUC 为 0.85 [0.81;0.88]。阳性和阴性似然比(LR+;LR-)分别为 4.24 [3.18-5.65] 和 0.39 [0.29-0.52]。对于死亡率,总体敏感性为 0.358 [0.238;0.498],总体特异性为 0.742 [0.656;0.813],AUC 为 0.553(特异性给定敏感性的敏感性置信区间:[0.4014;0.6759];特异性给定敏感性的特异性置信区间:[0.4799;0.6332])。LR+和 LR-分别为 1.39 [1.36-1.42] 和 0.87 [0.85-0.89]。

结论

我们的研究表明,SI 可能在预测成人创伤患者 MT 需求方面作用有限。SI 不能准确预测死亡率,但可能有助于识别低死亡率风险的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/2091806c4315/13054_2023_4386_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/b1eb5ccc6777/13054_2023_4386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/5fee6b030074/13054_2023_4386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/25dc8d849d01/13054_2023_4386_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/b588d03ffc41/13054_2023_4386_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/2091806c4315/13054_2023_4386_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/b1eb5ccc6777/13054_2023_4386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/5fee6b030074/13054_2023_4386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/25dc8d849d01/13054_2023_4386_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/b588d03ffc41/13054_2023_4386_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/9985849/2091806c4315/13054_2023_4386_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤患者休克指数预测大量输血和死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 5;27(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w.
2
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.使用休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数预测创伤性休克患者的大量输血情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 5;13(7):683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070683.
3
Shock index increase from the field to the emergency room is associated with higher odds of massive transfusion in trauma patients with stable blood pressure: A cross-sectional analysis.从现场到急诊室,休克指数增加与血压稳定的创伤患者大量输血的可能性更高相关:一项横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216153. eCollection 2019.
4
Shock index as a predictor for mortality in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.休克指数预测创伤患者死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2559-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01932-z. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Shock Index as a Predictor of Massive Transfusion and Emergency Surgery on the Modern Battlefield.冲击指数在现代战场上对大量输血和急诊手术的预测价值。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Prehospital parameters can help to predict coagulopathy and massive transfusion in trauma patients.院前参数有助于预测创伤患者的凝血病和大量输血。
Vox Sang. 2017 Aug;112(6):557-566. doi: 10.1111/vox.12545. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
7
The Extremity/Mechanism/Shock Index/GCS (EMS-G) score: A novel pre-hospital scoring system for early and appropriate MTP activation.创伤/机制/冲击指数/格拉斯哥昏迷评分(EMS-G):一种新型的院前评分系统,用于早期和适当的 MTP 激活。
Am J Surg. 2019 Dec;218(6):1195-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.休克指数与ABC评分预测创伤患者大量输血需求的准确性。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Comparison of Shock Index With the Assessment of Blood Consumption Score for Association With Massive Transfusion During Hemorrhage Control for Trauma.创伤性出血控制期间与大量输血相关的休克指数与血液消耗评分评估的比较。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(6):341-349. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000613.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of machine learning and human prediction to identify trauma patients in need of hemorrhage control resuscitation (ShockMatrix study): a prospective observational study.机器学习与人工预测用于识别需要出血控制复苏的创伤患者的比较(休克矩阵研究):一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jun 12;55:101340. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101340. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Age-Related Disparities in the Predictive Performance of the Shock Index for Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.创伤患者大量输血时休克指数预测性能的年龄相关差异:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 1;14(7):2416. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072416.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Shock Index for the Prediction of Interventions and Mortality in Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma.创伤性休克指数对钝性胸部创伤患者干预和死亡率的预测价值。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:438-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.067. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
Role of glucose/potassium ratio and shock index in predicting mortality in patients with isolated thoracoabdominal blunt trauma.葡萄糖/钾比值和休克指数在预测孤立性胸腹钝性创伤患者死亡率中的作用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1442-1448. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.15245.
3
Mortality of hospital walk-in trauma patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Major Bleeding in the Emergency Department: A Practical Guide for Optimal Management.
急诊科的严重出血:最佳管理实用指南
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 25;14(3):784. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030784.
4
Comparison of conventional coagulation tests and ROTEM in identifying trauma-induced coagulopathy for massive haemorrhage protocol activation.传统凝血试验与旋转血栓弹力图(ROTEM)在识别创伤性凝血病以启动大量出血方案方面的比较。
Transfus Med. 2025 Jun;35(3):266-274. doi: 10.1111/tme.13128. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
5
Delta shock index predicts injury severity, interventions, and outcomes in trauma patients: A 10-year retrospective observational study.Delta休克指数预测创伤患者的损伤严重程度、干预措施及预后:一项10年回顾性观察研究。
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(4):99587. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.99587.
6
Using shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA) to predict prolonged length of stay in perforated appendicitis: a retrospective review.应用休克指数,儿科年龄校正(SIPA)预测穿孔性阑尾炎的住院时间延长:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):290. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05873-z.
7
Emergency cesarean section in pregnant trauma patients presenting after motor vehicle collision.机动车碰撞后出现的创伤孕妇的急诊剖宫产术。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 28;10(19):e38707. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38707. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
8
Investigating Factors Affecting Mortality Due to Spinal Cord Trauma in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.调查重症监护病房收治的脊髓损伤患者死亡的影响因素。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024;12(3):136-141. doi: 10.30476/beat.2024.103079.1517.
9
Shock index and shock index, pediatric age-adjusted as predictors of mortality in pediatric patients with trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.休克指数和儿科年龄校正休克指数作为创伤性儿科患者死亡率的预测指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307367. eCollection 2024.
10
Shock index to predict outcomes in patients with trauma following traffic collisions: a retrospective cohort study.交通碰撞后创伤患者的休克指数预测结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2191-2198. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02545-4. Epub 2024 May 31.
医院急诊创伤患者的死亡率:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2022 Sep 6;9(1):e784. doi: 10.1002/ams2.784. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Outcomes of Trauma Patients Present to the Emergency Department with a Shock Index of ≥1.0.休克指数≥1.0的创伤患者在急诊科的治疗结果。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_86_21. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Association between prehospital field to emergency department delta shock index and in-hospital mortality in patients with torso and extremity trauma: A multinational, observational study.创伤性胸腹部和四肢损伤患者院前场到急诊科休克指数差与院内死亡率的相关性:一项多中心、观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 25;16(10):e0258811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258811. eCollection 2021.
6
Massive transfusion in trauma: an evolving paradigm.创伤性大量输血:一个不断发展的模式。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Mar;88(3):184-191. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15914-0. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Prehospital shock index outperforms hypotension alone in predicting significant injury in trauma patients.在预测创伤患者的严重损伤方面,院前休克指数比单纯低血压表现更优。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):e000712. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000712. eCollection 2021.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA):解释、详述及清单
BMJ. 2020 Aug 14;370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632.
9
Shock Index as a Predictor of Massive Transfusion and Emergency Surgery on the Modern Battlefield.冲击指数在现代战场上对大量输血和急诊手术的预测价值。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.GRADE 指南:21 部分 1. 研究设计、偏倚风险和间接性,用于对一组证据进行测试准确性的确定性评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Feb 12.