Bundhun Pravesh Kumar, Bhurtu Akash, Huang Feng
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007140.
The synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score is an angiographic tool which is used to determine the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to compare PCI versus coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with a high SYNTAX score in order to confirm with evidence whether the former is really association with worse clinical outcomes.
The National database of medical research articles (MEDLINE/PubMed), EMBASE database, and the Cochrane library were searched for publications comparing PCI versus CABG in patients with a high SYNTAX score, respectively. Death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeated revascularization, and a combined outcome death/stroke/MI were considered as the clinical endpoints. RevMan software was used to analyze the data, whereby odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as the statistical parameters.
A total number of 1074 patients were included (455 patients with a high SYNTAX score were classified in the PCI group and 619 other patients with a high SYNTAX score were classified in the CABG group). A SYNTAX score cut-off value of ≥33 was considered relevant. Compared with CABG, mortality was significantly higher with a high SYNTAX score following PCI with OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.70; P = .006, I = 0%. The combined outcome death/stroke/MI was also significantly higher following PCI with a high SYNTAX score, with OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.30; P = .0009, I = 0%. In addition, PCI was also associated with significantly higher MI and repeated revascularization when compared with CABG, with OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.75 to 7.89; P = .0006, I = 0% and OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.71 to 10.94; P = .002, I = 77%, respectively. However, stroke was not significantly different.
Compared with CABG, worse clinical outcomes were observed following PCI in patients with a high SYNTAX score, confirming with evidence, published clinical literatures. Therefore, CABG should be recommended to CAD patients who have been allotted a high SYNTAX score.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与心脏外科手术(SYNTAX)评分之间的协同作用是一种血管造影工具,用于确定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的复杂性。我们旨在比较高SYNTAX评分患者接受PCI与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的情况,以确凿证据证实前者是否真的与更差的临床结局相关。
分别在医学研究文章国家数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed)、EMBASE数据库和Cochrane图书馆中检索比较高SYNTAX评分患者接受PCI与CABG的出版物。将死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、中风、再次血运重建以及死亡/中风/MI联合结局视为临床终点。使用RevMan软件分析数据,将比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)用作统计参数。
共纳入1074例患者(455例高SYNTAX评分患者被分类到PCI组,619例其他高SYNTAX评分患者被分类到CABG组)。SYNTAX评分临界值≥33被认为具有相关性。与CABG相比,高SYNTAX评分患者接受PCI后的死亡率显著更高,OR为1.79,95%CI为1.18至2.70;P = 0.006,I = 0%。高SYNTAX评分患者接受PCI后的死亡/中风/MI联合结局也显著更高,OR为1.69,95%CI为1.24至2.30;P = 0.0009,I = 0%。此外,与CABG相比,PCI还与显著更高的MI和再次血运重建相关,OR分别为3.72,95%CI为1.75至7.89;P = 0.0006,I = 0%以及OR为4.33,95%CI为1.71至10.94;P = 0.002,I = 77%。然而,中风方面无显著差异。
与CABG相比,高SYNTAX评分患者接受PCI后观察到更差的临床结局,这与已发表的临床文献证据相符。因此,对于被分配高SYNTAX评分的CAD患者,应推荐CABG。