Suppr超能文献

闲暇时间体力活动是否能预防腰痛?36 项前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Does leisure time physical activity protect against low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 prospective cohort studies.

机构信息

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(19):1410-1418. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097352. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are plausible mechanisms whereby leisure time physical activity may protect against low back pain (LBP) but there have been no quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the subject.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to assess the effect of leisure time physical activity on non-specific LBP.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from their inception through July 2016. Methodological quality of included studies was evaluated. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six prospective cohort studies (n=158 475 participants) qualified for meta-analyses. Participation in sport or other leisure physical activity reduced the risk of frequent or chronic LBP, but not LBP for 1 day in the past month or past 6-12 months. Risk of frequent/chronic LBP was 11% lower (adjusted risk ratio (RR)=0.89, CI 0.82 to 0.97, I=31%, n=48 520) in moderately/highly active individuals, 14% lower (RR=0.86, CI 0.79 to 0.94, I=0%, n=33 032) in moderately active individuals and 16% lower (RR=0.84, CI 0.75 to 0.93, I=0%, n=33 032) in highly active individuals in comparison with individuals without regular physical activity. For LBP in the past 1-12 months, adjusted RR was 0.98 (CI 0.93 to 1.03, I=50%, n=32 654) for moderate/high level of activity, 0.94 (CI 0.84 to 1.05, I=3%, n=8549) for moderate level of activity and 1.06 (CI 0.89 to 1.25, I=53%, n=8554) for high level of activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Leisure time physical activity may reduce the risk of chronic LBP by 11%-16%. The finding, however, should be interpreted cautiously due to limitations of the original studies. If this effect size is proven in future research, the public health implications would be substantial.

摘要

背景

有合理的机制表明,闲暇时间的体育活动可能有助于预防下背痛(LBP),但目前还没有对这一主题进行质量系统评价和荟萃分析。

目的

本综述旨在评估闲暇时间体育活动对非特异性 LBP 的影响。

方法

从各数据库的创建到 2016 年 7 月,我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行了文献检索。评估了纳入研究的方法学质量。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并评估了异质性和发表偏倚。

结果

36 项前瞻性队列研究(n=158475 名参与者)符合荟萃分析的条件。参加运动或其他休闲体育活动可降低频发或慢性 LBP 的风险,但不能降低过去 1 个月或过去 6-12 个月内 1 天的 LBP 风险。在中度/高度活跃的个体中,频发/慢性 LBP 的风险降低 11%(调整后的风险比(RR)=0.89,CI 0.82 至 0.97,I=31%,n=48520),在中度活跃的个体中降低 14%(RR=0.86,CI 0.79 至 0.94,I=0%,n=33032),在高度活跃的个体中降低 16%(RR=0.84,CI 0.75 至 0.93,I=0%,n=33032),与不进行规律体育活动的个体相比。对于过去 1-12 个月的 LBP,调整后的 RR 为 0.98(CI 0.93 至 1.03,I=50%,n=32654),中度/高水平活动为 0.94(CI 0.84 至 1.05,I=3%,n=8549),中度水平活动为 0.94(CI 0.84 至 1.05,I=3%,n=8549)。n=8554)和高水平活动 1.06(CI 0.89 至 1.25,I=53%,n=8554)。

结论

闲暇时间的体育活动可能会降低 11%-16%的慢性 LBP 风险。然而,由于原始研究的局限性,该发现应谨慎解释。如果这一效应大小在未来的研究中得到证实,那么公共卫生的影响将是巨大的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验