Comachio Josielli, Beckenkamp Paula R, Ho Emma Kwan-Yee, Shaheed Christina Abdel, Stamatakis Emmanuel, Ferreira Manuela Loureiro, Lan Qianwen, Mork Paul Jarle, Holtermann Andreas, Wang Daniel Xin Mo, Ferreira Paulo H
Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Apr 2;14:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101038.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews on the benefits and harms of exercise therapy and physical activity (PA) for the secondary prevention and management of low back pain (LBP). METHODS: An umbrella review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy and PA in the management and secondary prevention of LBP. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), including reference lists of relevant reviews, covering studies published between January 1, 2010 and May 20, 2024. Eligible studies were systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials and observational studies, with or without meta-analyses. The primary outcome for secondary prevention was LBP recurrence, while for management, primary outcomes included pain intensity and disability, with adverse events as secondary outcomes. Data were extracted across immediate, short-term, intermediate, and long-term follow-up periods. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence, and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR) tool was applied by 2 independent reviewers (JC, QL, and/or DXMW) to evaluate the quality of the included reviews. The study was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). RESULTS: A total of 70 systematic reviews were included, 43 with meta-analyses, 7 with network meta-analyses, and 20 without meta-analyses. Six (out of 10) reviews with meta-analyses for secondary prevention indicated a small benefit from general exercises and leisure-time PA (low-to-moderate certainty). For LBP management, 35 (out of 36) reviews reported that exercise therapies such as Pilates, motor control, mixed exercise, Tai Chi, water-based exercises, and yoga showed small beneficial effects on pain and disability compared to minimal intervention mainly in the short-term (low-to-moderate certainty). Seven network meta-analyses favored motor control and Pilates over other forms of exercise to reduce pain (low certainty). Adverse events were reported in less than 31% of the reviews, predominantly involving post-exercise soreness and temporary increases in pain, mainly in yoga-related studies. Adverse events were considered minor, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: There is low-to-moderate certainty that exercise therapy and leisure-time PA are beneficial for improving pain and preventing the recurrence of LBP. However, evidence on the potential harms of these interventions is limited, and adverse events related to exercise and PA remain under-investigated.
目的:本系统综述的目的是综合系统评价中关于运动疗法和身体活动(PA)对腰痛(LBP)二级预防和管理的益处与危害的证据。 方法:进行了一项系统综述,以评估运动疗法和PA在LBP管理和二级预防中的有效性。在MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane系统评价数据库和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)中进行了系统检索,包括相关综述的参考文献列表,涵盖2010年1月1日至2024年5月20日发表的研究。符合条件的研究是对随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价,有无Meta分析均可。二级预防的主要结局是LBP复发,而对于管理,主要结局包括疼痛强度和残疾,不良事件作为次要结局。在即时、短期、中期和长期随访期间提取数据。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)框架评估证据的确定性,并由2名独立评审员(JC、QL和/或DXMW)应用多系统评价评估工具(AMSTAR)评估纳入综述的质量。该研究在开放科学框架(OSF)上进行了前瞻性注册。 结果:共纳入70项系统评价,43项有Meta分析,7项有网状Meta分析,20项无Meta分析。10项有Meta分析的二级预防综述中有6项表明,一般运动和休闲时间PA有小的益处(低至中等确定性)。对于LBP管理,36项综述中有35项报告称,与最小干预相比,普拉提、运动控制、混合运动、太极拳、水上运动和瑜伽等运动疗法在短期内对疼痛和残疾有小的有益影响(低至中等确定性)。7项网状Meta分析支持运动控制和普拉提优于其他形式的运动以减轻疼痛(低确定性)。不到31%的综述报告了不良事件,主要涉及运动后酸痛和疼痛暂时增加,主要在与瑜伽相关的研究中。不良事件被认为是轻微的,未报告严重不良事件。 结论:运动疗法和休闲时间PA对改善疼痛和预防LBP复发有益,这一结论的确定性为低至中等。然而,关于这些干预措施潜在危害的证据有限,与运动和PA相关的不良事件仍未得到充分研究。
J Sport Health Sci. 2025-4-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-1-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-1-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-8-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-8
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024
J Strength Cond Res. 2024-1-1
Disabil Rehabil. 2024-8