Turner Katy Me, Christensen Hannah, Adams Elisabeth J, McAdams David, Fifer Helen, McDonnell Anthony, Woodford Neil
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 14;7(6):e015447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015447.
To create a mathematical model to investigate the treatment impact and economic implications of introducing an antimicrobial resistance point-of-care test (AMR POCT) for gonorrhoea as a way of extending the life of current last-line treatments.
Modelling study.
England.
Patients accessing sexual health services.
Incremental impact of introducing a hypothetical AMR POCT that could detect susceptibility to previous first-line antibiotics, for example, ciprofloxacin or penicillin, so that patients are given more tailored treatment, compared with the current situation where all patients are given therapy with ceftriaxone and azithromycin. The hypothetical intervention was assessed using a mathematical model developed in Excel. The model included initial and follow-up attendances, loss to follow-up, use of standard or tailored treatment, time taken to treatment and the costs of testing and treatment.
Number of doses of ceftriaxone saved, mean time to most appropriate treatment, mean number of visits per (infected) patient, number of patients lost to follow-up and total cost of testing.
In the current situation, an estimated 33 431 ceftriaxone treatments are administered annually and 792 gonococcal infections remain untreated due to loss to follow-up. The use of an AMR POCT for ciprofloxacin could reduce these ceftriaxone treatments by 66%, and for an AMR POCT for penicillin by 79%. The mean time for patients receiving an antibiotic treatment is reduced by 2 days in scenarios including POCT and no positive patients remain untreated through eliminating loss to follow-up. Such POCTs are estimated to add £34 million to testing costs, but this does not take into account reductions in costs of repeat attendances and the reuse of older, cheaper antimicrobials.
The introduction of AMR POCT could allow clinicians to discern between the majority of gonorrhoea-positive patients with strains that could be treated with older, previously abandoned first-line treatments, and those requiring our current last-line dual therapy. Such tests could extend the useful life of dual ceftriaxone and azithromycin therapy, thus pushing back the time when gonorrhoea may become untreatable.
创建一个数学模型,以研究引入淋病抗菌药物耐药性即时检测(AMR POCT)作为延长当前一线治疗药物使用寿命的一种方式所产生的治疗影响和经济意义。
建模研究。
英国。
接受性健康服务的患者。
引入一种假设的AMR POCT的增量影响,该检测能够检测对先前一线抗生素(如环丙沙星或青霉素)的敏感性,从而使患者得到更具针对性的治疗,与当前所有患者均接受头孢曲松和阿奇霉素治疗的情况进行比较。使用在Excel中开发的数学模型对该假设干预措施进行评估。该模型包括初次和后续就诊情况、失访情况、标准或针对性治疗的使用情况、治疗所需时间以及检测和治疗成本。
节省的头孢曲松剂量数、获得最恰当治疗的平均时间、每位(感染)患者的平均就诊次数、失访患者数以及检测总成本。
在当前情况下,估计每年使用33431次头孢曲松治疗,且由于失访有792例淋病感染未得到治疗。使用针对环丙沙星的AMR POCT可使这些头孢曲松治疗减少66%,使用针对青霉素的AMR POCT可减少79%。在包括POCT的情况下,接受抗生素治疗的患者的平均时间减少2天,并且通过消除失访没有阳性患者未得到治疗。据估计,此类POCT会使检测成本增加3400万英镑,但这未考虑到复诊成本的降低以及使用更旧、更便宜的抗菌药物所带来的成本节约。
引入AMR POCT可使临床医生区分大多数淋病阳性患者中那些菌株可用更旧的、先前已弃用的一线治疗方法治疗的患者,以及那些需要当前一线联合治疗的患者。此类检测可延长头孢曲松和阿奇霉素联合治疗的使用寿命,从而推迟淋病可能变得无法治疗的时间。