Arnoux Léo, Fromentin Sebastien, Farotto Dario, Beraneck Mathieu, McIntyre Joseph, Tagliabue Michele
Center for Neurophysics, Physiology & Pathology, UMR 8119, CNRS Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Ikerbasque Science Foundation, Bilbao, Spain; and.
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep 1;118(3):1598-1608. doi: 10.1152/jn.00140.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
To perform goal-oriented hand movement, humans combine multiple sensory signals (e.g., vision and proprioception) that can be encoded in various reference frames (body centered and/or exo-centered). In a previous study (Tagliabue M, McIntyre J. 8: e68438, 2013), we showed that, when aligning a hand to a remembered target orientation, the brain encodes both target and response in visual space when the target is sensed by one hand and the response is performed by the other, even though both are sensed only through proprioception. Here we ask whether such visual encoding is due ) to the necessity of transferring sensory information across the brain hemispheres, or ) to the necessity, due to the arms' anatomical mirror symmetry, of transforming the joint signals of one limb into the reference frame of the other. To answer this question, we asked subjects to perform purely proprioceptive tasks in different conditions: Intra, the same arm sensing the target and performing the movement; Inter/Parallel, one arm sensing the target and the other reproducing its orientation; and Inter/Mirror, one arm sensing the target and the other mirroring its orientation. Performance was very similar between Intra and Inter/Mirror (conditions not requiring joint-signal transformations), while both differed from Inter/Parallel. Manipulation of the visual scene in a virtual reality paradigm showed visual encoding of proprioceptive information only in the latter condition. These results suggest that the visual encoding of purely proprioceptive tasks is not due to interhemispheric transfer of the proprioceptive information per se, but to the necessity of transforming joint signals between mirror-symmetric limbs. Why does the brain encode goal-oriented, intermanual tasks in a visual space, even in the absence of visual feedback about the target and the hand? We show that the visual encoding is not due to the transfer of proprioceptive signals between brain hemispheres per se, but to the need, due to the mirror symmetry of the two limbs, of transforming joint angle signals of one arm in different joint signals of the other.
为了执行目标导向的手部运动,人类会整合多种感觉信号(如视觉和本体感觉),这些信号可以在各种参考系(以身体为中心和/或以外部为中心)中进行编码。在之前的一项研究中(塔利亚布埃M,麦金太尔J. 8: e68438, 2013),我们发现,当将一只手对准记忆中的目标方向时,即使目标和反应都仅通过本体感觉感知到,但当目标由一只手感知而反应由另一只手执行时,大脑会在视觉空间中对目标和反应进行编码。在这里,我们要问这种视觉编码是 ) 由于跨大脑半球传递感觉信息的必要性,还是 ) 由于双臂的解剖镜像对称性,将一个肢体的关节信号转换到另一个肢体的参考系中的必要性。为了回答这个问题,我们要求受试者在不同条件下执行纯本体感觉任务:内部,同一只手臂感知目标并执行运动;跨/平行,一只手臂感知目标,另一只手臂复制其方向;以及跨/镜像,一只手臂感知目标,另一只手臂镜像其方向。内部和跨/镜像(不需要关节信号转换的条件)之间的表现非常相似,而两者都与跨/平行不同。在虚拟现实范式中对视觉场景的操纵表明,仅在后一种条件下存在本体感觉信息的视觉编码。这些结果表明,纯本体感觉任务的视觉编码不是由于本体感觉信息本身的跨半球传递,而是由于镜像对称肢体之间转换关节信号的必要性。为什么大脑即使在没有关于目标和手的视觉反馈的情况下,也会在视觉空间中对手部间目标导向任务进行编码?我们表明,视觉编码不是由于本体感觉信号本身在大脑半球之间的传递,而是由于两个肢体的镜像对称性,需要将一只手臂的关节角度信号转换为另一只手臂的不同关节信号。