• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将“激励性慢性阻塞性肺疾病外展计划™”扩展至急诊科:可行性评估。

Expanding The INSPIRED COPD Outreach Program™ to the emergency department: a feasibility assessment.

作者信息

Gillis Darcy, Demmons Jillian, Rocker Graeme

机构信息

Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Division of Respirology, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 May 29;12:1597-1604. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S136183. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S136183
PMID:28615932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5459965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Halifax-based INSPIRED COPD Outreach Program™ is a facility-to-community home-based novel clinical initiative that through improved care transitions, self-management, and engagement in advance care planning has demonstrated a significant (60%-80%) reduction in health care utilization with substantial cost aversion. By assessing the feasibility of expanding INSPIRED into the emergency department (ED) we anticipated extending reach and potential for positive impact of INSPIRED to those with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) who avoid hospital admission.

METHODS

Patients were eligible for the INSPIRED-ED study if >40 years of age, diagnosed with AECOPD and discharged from the ED, willing to be referred, community dwelling with at least one of: previous use of the ED services, admission to Intermediate Care Unit/Intensive Care Unit, or admission to hospital with AECOPD in the past year. We set feasibility objectives for referral rates, completion of action plans, advance care planning participation, and reduction in ED visit frequency.

RESULTS

Referral rates were 0.5/week. Among eligible patients (n=174) 33 (19%) were referred of whom 15 (M=4, F=11) enrolled in INSPIRED-ED. Mean (SD) age was 68 (7) years, post-bronchdilator FEV 44.2 (15.5) % predicted, and Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score 3.8 (0.41). We met feasibility objectives for action plan and advance care planning completion. Frequency of subsequent ED visits fell by 54%. Mean (SD) Care Transition Measure (CTM-3) improved from 8.6 (2.0) to 11.3 (1.3), =0.0004, and of 14 patients responding 12 (86%) found the program very helpful. An additional 34 patients were enrolled to our regular program from those referred but ineligible for INSPIRED-ED (n=27) or unwilling to participate (n=7).

CONCLUSIONS

INSPIRED-ED outcomes were generally positive, however referral and enrollment rates were lower than anticipated. Despite the potential of early self-management education, the ED may not be the ideal recruitment setting for home-based programs. Our findings underline the importance of conducting preliminary work to ascertain best settings for implementing new self-management education initiatives.

摘要

背景

总部位于哈利法克斯的“激发慢性阻塞性肺疾病外展计划”(INSPIRED COPD Outreach Program™)是一项从医疗机构到社区的新型居家临床倡议,通过改善护理过渡、自我管理以及参与预先护理计划,已证明医疗保健利用率显著降低(60%-80%),并实现了可观的成本节约。通过评估将“激发计划”扩展到急诊科(ED)的可行性,我们期望将“激发计划”的覆盖范围和积极影响潜力扩大到那些避免住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者。

方法

年龄大于40岁、被诊断为AECOPD且从急诊科出院、愿意接受转诊、居住在社区且满足以下至少一项条件的患者 eligible for the INSPIRED-ED study:既往使用过急诊科服务、入住过渡护理单元/重症监护病房、或在过去一年因AECOPD住院。我们设定了转诊率、行动计划完成率、预先护理计划参与率以及急诊科就诊频率降低方面的可行性目标。

结果

转诊率为每周0.5例。在 eligible patients(n=174)中,33例(19%)被转诊,其中15例(男性4例,女性11例)enrolled in INSPIRED-ED。平均(标准差)年龄为68(7)岁,支气管扩张剂后FEV占预计值的44.2(15.5)%,医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难评分为3.8(0.41)。我们实现了行动计划和预先护理计划完成方面的可行性目标。后续急诊科就诊频率下降了54%。平均(标准差)护理过渡指标(CTM-3)从8.6(2.0)提高到11.3(1.3),P=0.0004,在14例有回应的患者中,12例(86%)认为该计划非常有帮助。另外34例患者从被转诊但不符合INSPIRED-ED条件(n=27)或不愿意参与(n=7)的患者中纳入了我们的常规计划。

结论

“激发计划”-急诊科的结果总体上是积极的,然而转诊率和参与率低于预期。尽管早期自我管理教育有潜力,但急诊科可能不是居家计划的理想招募场所。我们的研究结果强调了开展初步工作以确定实施新的自我管理教育倡议的最佳场所的重要性。

相似文献

1
Expanding The INSPIRED COPD Outreach Program™ to the emergency department: a feasibility assessment.将“激励性慢性阻塞性肺疾病外展计划™”扩展至急诊科:可行性评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 May 29;12:1597-1604. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S136183. eCollection 2017.
2
Spreading improvements for advanced COPD care through a Canadian Collaborative.通过加拿大合作项目推广晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理的改进措施。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 26;12:2157-2164. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S140043. eCollection 2017.
3
'INSPIRED' COPD Outreach Program™: doing the right things right.“激发灵感的”慢性阻塞性肺疾病外展项目™:正确地做正确的事。
Clin Invest Med. 2014 Oct 4;37(5):E311-9.
4
Expanding Paramedicine in the Community (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.社区拓展辅助医疗服务(EPIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 2;15:473. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-473.
5
Long term effects of an integrated care intervention on hospital utilization in patients with severe COPD: a single centre controlled study.综合护理干预对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者医院利用情况的长期影响:一项单中心对照研究。
Respir Res. 2015 Feb 3;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0170-1.
6
Evaluation of 'care bundles' for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a multisite study in the UK.评估“护理包”在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的应用:英国多地点研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 May 30;6(1):e000425. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000425. eCollection 2019.
7
Emergency department management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: factors predicting readmission.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的急诊科管理:预测再入院的因素
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 May 23;13:1647-1654. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S163250. eCollection 2018.
8
Randomized trial of pragmatic education for low-risk COPD patients: impact on hospitalizations and emergency department visits.随机试验对低危 COPD 患者的实用教育:对住院和急诊就诊的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:719-28. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S36025. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
9
Frequent utilization of the emergency department for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.经常利用急诊部门治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的急性加重。
Respir Res. 2014 Apr 10;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-40.
10
Direct costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among managed care patients.管理式医疗患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病的直接成本。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010 Oct 5;5:341-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S13771.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying RE-AIM to examine the impact of an implementation facilitation package to scale up a program for Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.应用RE-AIM模型来检验实施促进方案对扩大慢性阻塞性肺疾病退伍军人项目规模的影响。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 21;4(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00520-5.
2
Evaluation of an implementation package to deliver the COPD CARE service.实施一揽子计划以提供 COPD CARE 服务的评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002074.
3
The Voice of Patients Really Matters: Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences Measures to Assess Effectiveness of Home-Based Integrated Care-A Scoping Review of Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Breathlessness and presentation to the emergency department: a survey and clinical record review.呼吸急促与急诊科就诊情况:一项调查及临床记录回顾
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0396-4.
2
Do self-management interventions in COPD patients work and which patients benefit most? An individual patient data meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的自我管理干预措施是否有效,哪些患者受益最大?一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 31;11:2063-74. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S107884. eCollection 2016.
3
Palliative care for chronic illness: driving change.
患者的声音至关重要:运用患者报告的结局和体验指标评估居家综合护理的有效性——一项实践范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 28;11(1):98. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010098.
4
Effectiveness and implementation of palliative care interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者姑息治疗干预措施的有效性与实施:一项系统评价
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):486-502. doi: 10.1177/0269216320981294. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
5
The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review.中级护理(包括过渡性护理干预措施)在功能、医疗保健利用和成本方面的效果:范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Dec;11(6):961-974. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00365-4. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Spreading improvements for advanced COPD care through a Canadian Collaborative.通过加拿大合作项目推广晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理的改进措施。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 26;12:2157-2164. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S140043. eCollection 2017.
慢性病的姑息治疗:推动变革。
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E493-E498. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151454. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Characteristics of effective self-management interventions in patients with COPD: individual patient data meta-analysis.COPD 患者有效自我管理干预措施的特征:个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):55-68. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01860-2015. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Definition of a COPD self-management intervention: International Expert Group consensus.COPD 自我管理干预的定义:国际专家小组共识。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00025-2016. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Depression Is Associated with Readmission for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.抑郁症与慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重再入院有关。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Feb;13(2):197-203. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-439OC.
7
Palliative Care in Advanced Lung Disease: The Challenge of Integrating Palliation Into Everyday Care.晚期肺病的姑息治疗:将姑息治疗融入日常护理的挑战。
Chest. 2015 Sep;148(3):801-809. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2593.
8
COPD: early diagnosis and treatment to slow disease progression.慢性阻塞性肺疾病:早期诊断与治疗以减缓疾病进展。
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Mar;69(3):336-49. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12522. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
9
'INSPIRED' COPD Outreach Program™: doing the right things right.“激发灵感的”慢性阻塞性肺疾病外展项目™:正确地做正确的事。
Clin Invest Med. 2014 Oct 4;37(5):E311-9.
10
Opioid therapy for refractory dyspnea in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients' experiences and outcomes.晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者难治性呼吸困难的阿片类药物治疗:患者的体验与结局
CMAJ Open. 2013 Jan 24;1(1):E27-36. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20120031. eCollection 2013 Jan.