• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COPD 自我管理干预的定义:国际专家小组共识。

Definition of a COPD self-management intervention: International Expert Group consensus.

机构信息

Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Dept of Medical Psychology and Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00025-2016. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1183/13993003.00025-2016
PMID:27076595
Abstract

There is an urgent need for consensus on what defines a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management intervention. We aimed to obtain consensus regarding the conceptual definition of a COPD self-management intervention by engaging an international panel of COPD self-management experts using Delphi technique features and an additional group meeting.In each consensus round the experts were asked to provide feedback on the proposed definition and to score their level of agreement (1=totally disagree; 5=totally agree). The information provided was used to modify the definition for the next consensus round. Thematic analysis was used for free text responses and descriptive statistics were used for agreement scores.In total, 28 experts participated. The consensus round response rate varied randomly over the five rounds (ranging from 48% (n=13) to 85% (n=23)), and mean definition agreement scores increased from 3.8 (round 1) to 4.8 (round 5) with an increasing percentage of experts allocating the highest score of 5 (round 1: 14% (n=3); round 5: 83% (n=19)).In this study we reached consensus regarding a conceptual definition of what should be a COPD self-management intervention, clarifying the requisites for such an intervention. Operationalisation of this conceptual definition in the near future will be an essential next step.

摘要

目前非常需要就定义慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)自我管理干预达成共识。我们旨在通过采用德尔菲技术特征和另外一次小组会议,让 COPD 自我管理专家国际小组参与,从而就 COPD 自我管理干预的概念定义达成共识。在每一轮共识中,专家们被要求就提出的定义提供反馈,并对其同意程度进行评分(1=完全不同意;5=完全同意)。所提供的信息用于在下一轮共识中修改定义。对自由文本回复进行了主题分析,对同意评分进行了描述性统计。共有 28 名专家参与。五个回合的共识回合回复率随机变化(范围从 48%(n=13)到 85%(n=23)),定义同意评分的平均值从 3.8(第 1 轮)增加到 4.8(第 5 轮),给予最高分 5 的专家比例也在增加(第 1 轮:14%(n=3);第 5 轮:83%(n=19))。在这项研究中,我们就 COPD 自我管理干预的概念定义达成了共识,阐明了此类干预的必要条件。在不久的将来,对这一概念定义的实施将是下一步的重要工作。

相似文献

1
Definition of a COPD self-management intervention: International Expert Group consensus.COPD 自我管理干预的定义:国际专家小组共识。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00025-2016. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Factors Associated with Non-Adherence to Self-Management Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Survey Using the Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process.与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理不依从相关的因素:使用德尔菲技术和层次分析法进行的调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 4;19:1247-1259. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S451332. eCollection 2024.
3
An e-Delphi Study to Identify Priority Areas for Education on Advance Care Planning in COPD Management.电子德尔菲研究确定 COPD 管理中优先开展关于预先医疗指示的教育领域。
Respir Care. 2020 Mar;65(3):347-354. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07072. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Self-management behaviors to reduce exacerbation impact in COPD patients: a Delphi study.减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重影响的自我管理行为:一项德尔菲研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Sep 15;12:2735-2746. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S138867. eCollection 2017.
5
WAO consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE).世界变态反应组织食物过敏严重程度定义(DEFASE)共识
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Mar 2;16(3):100753. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100753. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.意大利多学会改良 Delphi 共识:结直肠手术吻合口漏的定义与处理。
Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):781-792. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00837-z. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Establishing an updated consensus on the conceptual and operational definitions of Making Every Contact Count (MECC) across experts within research and practice: an international Delphi Study.就研究与实践领域的专家对“让每次接触都有价值”(MECC)的概念和操作定义达成最新共识:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Public Health. 2024 May;230:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.01.023. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
8
Development of an active behavioural physiotherapy intervention (ABPI) for acute whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) II management: a modified Delphi study.开发用于急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)II型管理的主动行为物理治疗干预(ABPI):一项改良的德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 14;6(9):e011764. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011764.
9
Expert consensus on a standardised definition and severity classification for adverse events associated with spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilisation: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.与脊柱和外周关节推拿及松动相关不良事件的标准化定义和严重程度分类的专家共识:一项国际性电子 Delphi 研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e050219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050219.
10
Developmentally appropriate supported self-management for children and young people with chronic conditions: A consensus.发展适宜的支持性自我管理,用于患有慢性病的儿童和青少年:达成共识。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Mar;103(3):571-581. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-management and COPD: a qualitative study to explore the perceived barriers and recommendations to improve COPD management using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model.自我管理与慢性阻塞性肺疾病:一项质性研究,旨在运用信息-动机-行为技能模型探索慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中感知到的障碍及改进建议。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025 Jul 26;35(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41533-025-00443-9.
2
Evaluation of a Novel eHealth Tool for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Trial.一种用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复的新型电子健康工具的评估:随机对照试点及可行性试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 23;9:e68195. doi: 10.2196/68195.
3
Challenges and Opportunities for the Management of COPD: A Narrative Review of Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的挑战与机遇:患者及医疗保健专业人员观点的叙述性综述
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 Jul 30;12(4):339-356. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0597.
4
Recommendations for Improving Discharge-Related Care Following a COPD Exacerbation: An Expert Panel Consensus with Emphasis on Low- and Middle-Income Countries.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后改善出院相关护理的建议:以低收入和中等收入国家为重点的专家小组共识
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Apr 16;20:1111-1129. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S502971. eCollection 2025.
5
Predicting poor self-management behaviors in adults with newly diagnosed COPD: based on the information-motivation-behavioral skills model.预测新诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者自我管理行为不佳:基于信息-动机-行为技能模型
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):1384. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22569-8.
6
The State of the Art of eHealth Self-Management Interventions for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Scoping Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者电子健康自我管理干预的现状:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e57649. doi: 10.2196/57649.
7
Effects of Self-Management Interventions in People With Interstitial Lung Disease.自我管理干预措施对间质性肺疾病患者的影响。
Respir Care. 2023 Dec 28;69(1):114-127. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11298.
8
Early Identification of Exacerbations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者病情加重的早期识别
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 10;14(2):397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020397.
9
Personalizing Self-Management Interventions in COPD - Looking Beyond One-Size-Fits-All.慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理干预的个性化——超越一刀切的模式
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jan 8;20:65-68. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S511278. eCollection 2025.
10
Is longer really better? Results of a retrospective real-life cohort study evaluating the benefit of adding a weekly educational session to a traditional 8-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme in people with COPD.时间更长真的更好吗?一项回顾性真实队列研究的结果,该研究评估了在传统的为期8周的家庭肺康复计划基础上增加每周一次教育课程对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的益处。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e092096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092096.