Kim Kyung Soo
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 May;9(5):1265-1272. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.163.
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is an alternative modality for treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) with its less invasiveness and acceptable surgical outcomes. However, a few reports have been introduced for wound management to achieve better cosmetic wound healing and for placement of the chest tube in uniportal VATS. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of our novel method for wound closure and concomitant tube placement using continuous barbed suture material in uniportal VATS for PSP.
Between July 2012 and December 2015, consecutive 31 patients (22 males) underwent uniportal VATS to treat PSP. Bilateral approaches were performed in four patients, thus total 35 cases were enrolled. We divided them into two groups with one group of 17 (48.5%) cases (group A), using barbed absorbable wound closure device for knotless continuous wound closure and subsequent chest tube anchoring, and the other group of 18 (51.4%) cases (group B), using conventional suture anchoring after skin closure using absorbable suture device. Postoperative surgical outcomes were compared to assess the feasibility of this technique.
Demographic data demonstrate no significant difference in both groups. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay (3.7±1.2 4.1±1.2 days, P=0.267) and in median chest tube indwelling time (2.4±0.9 3.1±1.2 days, P=0.066), respectively. Operation time in group A was shorter than in group B but there was no significant difference (41.7±11.8 45.6±16.0 minutes, P=0.415). There was neither conversion to two or three port VATS in all cases. In group A, all chest tubes were removed with concomitant sealing the tube removal site by pulling the thread. Residual knots do not exist that stitch out procedure is not required. There was no wound complication in both groups during the median follow-up period of 18 months.
Knotless, barbed suture material technique for continuous wound closure with concomitant chest tube placement achieved equivocal outcomes in comparison to the conventional suture anchoring method. We suggest this simple technique for wound closure and easy tube removal with cosmetic wound healing in uniportal VATS for PSP.
单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)是治疗原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的一种替代方式,具有创伤小且手术效果可接受的特点。然而,关于单孔VATS中伤口处理以实现更好的美容性伤口愈合以及胸管放置的报道较少。因此,我们旨在评估在单孔VATS治疗PSP中使用连续倒刺缝线材料进行伤口闭合和同时放置胸管的新方法的可行性。
2012年7月至2015年12月期间,连续31例患者(22例男性)接受单孔VATS治疗PSP。4例患者采用双侧入路,共纳入35例病例。我们将他们分为两组,一组17例(48.5%)(A组),使用倒刺可吸收伤口闭合装置进行无结连续伤口闭合及随后的胸管固定,另一组18例(51.4%)(B组),在使用可吸收缝线装置闭合皮肤后采用传统缝线固定。比较术后手术结果以评估该技术的可行性。
人口统计学数据显示两组无显著差异。住院时间(3.7±1.2对4.1±1.2天,P = 0.267)和胸管中位留置时间(2.4±0.9对3.1±1.2天,P = 0.066)分别无显著差异。A组手术时间短于B组,但无显著差异(41.7±11.8对45.6±16.0分钟,P = 0.415)。所有病例均未转为双孔或三孔VATS。在A组中,所有胸管均通过拉动缝线在拔除胸管的同时封闭胸管拔除部位而拔除。不存在残留结,无需拆线操作。在18个月的中位随访期内,两组均无伤口并发症。
与传统缝线固定方法相比,使用无结倒刺缝线材料进行连续伤口闭合并同时放置胸管的技术取得了相当的结果。我们建议在单孔VATS治疗PSP中采用这种简单的伤口闭合技术以及易于拔除胸管并实现美容性伤口愈合。