• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to write an original radiological research manuscript.如何撰写原创放射学研究论文。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4455-4460. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
[Instructions for original radiological research manuscripts].[放射学原始研究稿件的说明]
Rofo. 2013 Jun;185(6):533-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330747. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
Writing for scientific medical manuscript: a guide for preparing manuscript submitted to biomedical journals.医学科研稿件写作:向生物医学期刊投稿的稿件准备指南
Acta Med Indones. 2007 Jan-Mar;39(1):50-5.
4
Major mistakes in scientific medical writing based on manuscripts' reviews.基于稿件评审的医学科研写作中的重大错误。
Tunis Med. 2024 Jan 5;102(1):13-18. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i1.4715.
5
Steps to Getting Your Manuscript Published in a High-Quality Medical Journal.将手稿发表在高质量医学期刊上的步骤。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):850-855. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6320-6. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Writing biomedical manuscripts part I: fundamentals and general rules.撰写生物医学稿件 第一部分:基础与一般规则
West Afr J Med. 2011 May-Jun;30(3):151-7.
7
What makes a plant science manuscript successful for publication?是什么让一篇植物科学稿件成功发表?
Funct Plant Biol. 2020 Nov;47(12):1138-1146. doi: 10.1071/FP20124.
8
Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.2012年提交至《兽医放射学与超声》杂志稿件的录用率及退稿原因
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2015 Jan-Feb;56(1):103-8. doi: 10.1111/vru.12168. Epub 2014 May 5.
9
So You Want to be an Author: A Primer on Writing for Publication in the Medical Literature Part I: Manuscript Preparation.所以你想成为一名作者:医学文献发表写作入门 第一部分:稿件准备
S D Med. 2016 Apr;69(4):172-5.
10
Teaching how to prepare a manuscript by means of rewriting published scientific papers.通过改写已发表的科学论文来教授如何准备一份手稿。
Genetics. 2007 Jan;175(1):17-20. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.066217. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Turning Your Presentations/Posters to Publications.将你的演示文稿/海报转化为出版物。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S143-S147. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800864. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted.提高科技论文接受率的十种方法
Head Neck Pathol. 2024 Mar 19;18(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s12105-024-01617-6.
3
Does the quality of the presentation influence the outcome of a submitted manuscript? A plea for including "How to submit" in medical education.演示文稿的质量会影响投稿论文的结果吗?医学教育中应纳入“如何投稿”的内容。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Apr;43(4):579-583. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02561-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistics 101 for Radiologists.放射科医生的统计学基础入门
Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1789-801. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150112.
2
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic steatosis: Validation in ex vivo human livers.肝脂肪变性的定量磁共振成像:在离体人肝脏中的验证
Hepatology. 2015 Nov;62(5):1444-55. doi: 10.1002/hep.28012. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.报告诊断准确性研究:STARD 实施 10 年后的一些改进。
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):781-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141160. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
4
On confirmation bias in imaging research.关于影像学研究中的确认偏倚。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May;41(5):1163-4. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24720. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
5
Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture.对负面结果的消极态度:关于科学价值与科学文化之间脱节的讨论
Dis Model Mech. 2014 Feb;7(2):171-3. doi: 10.1242/dmm.015123.
6
Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.诊断准确性研究的报告质量:对遵循《诊断准确性研究报告规范》(STARD)情况的调查进行的系统评价和荟萃分析
Evid Based Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):47-54. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101637. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
7
Severe aortic arch calcification depicted on chest radiography strongly suggests coronary artery calcification.胸部 X 光片显示严重的主动脉弓钙化强烈提示冠状动脉钙化。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2652-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2877-z. Epub 2013 May 10.
8
[Instructions for original radiological research manuscripts].[放射学原始研究稿件的说明]
Rofo. 2013 Jun;185(6):533-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330747. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
How to write a paper for publication.如何撰写一篇可供发表的论文。
Heart Lung Circ. 2000 Oct;9(2):82-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1444-2892.2000.00031.x.
10
Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators.撰写论文:初涉科研者的出版指南——循序渐进法
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):591-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850591.

如何撰写原创放射学研究论文。

How to write an original radiological research manuscript.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4455-4460. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8
PMID:28616726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6599681/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Many scientific manuscripts submitted for publication are limited by fundamental mistakes in their preparation, leading to rejection. We describe how to write a well-organized radiological research manuscript containing all of the important ingredients for effective communication of a hypothesis-driven scientific study in the context of medical imaging.

KEY POINTS

• Mistakes in the preparation of scientific manuscripts lead to rejection. • Scientific writing, like any important skill, can be learned. • A well-developed approach will improve the quality of scientific writing. • High-quality scientific writing is essential to communicate research results. • A well-organized manuscript effectively communicates a hypothesis-driven scientific study.

摘要

未加标签

许多提交出版的科学手稿由于其编写中的基本错误而受到限制,导致被拒绝。我们描述了如何编写一份组织良好的放射学研究手稿,其中包含医学成像背景下有效传达假设驱动的科学研究的所有重要内容的所有重要成分。

要点

  1. 科学手稿编写中的错误会导致被拒绝。

  2. 科学写作,就像任何重要的技能一样,可以学习。

  3. 精心制定的方法将提高科学写作的质量。

  4. 高质量的科学写作对于交流研究结果至关重要。

  5. 组织良好的手稿可以有效地传达假设驱动的科学研究。