• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)标准,低风险妊娠足月时的围产期及产妇结局:三级产科医院与助产士护理机构的比较。

Perinatal and maternal outcomes at term in low-risk pregnancies according to NICE criteria: comparison between a tertiary obstetrical hospital and midwife-attended units.

作者信息

Ignatov Tanja, Eggemann Holm, Costa Serban Dan, Ignatov Atanas

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otto-von-Guericke University, G.-Hauptmann Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;296(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4423-8. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-017-4423-8
PMID:28616828
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal and maternal outcomes at term at a single tertiary, university hospital in women with low-risk pregnancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with low-risk pregnancies, who delivered at University Women's Hospital Magdeburg between January 2010 and December 2014. Data were compared with data published by Brocklehurst et al. 2011.

RESULTS

Of the 6052 women investigated, 2014 were classified as low risk according to the NICE criteria and were eligible for analysis. In 94.8%, a spontaneous vertex birth was observed. There were only 2 (0.1%) perinatal complications and 52 (2.5%) maternal complications. Ventouse delivery, forceps delivery, and caesarean sections were performed in 2.5, 1, and 3.1% of the cases, respectively. Episiotomy was performed in 37.7% of women. The third and fourth degree perineal trauma were observed in 0.3% of births investigated. Complications during the third stage of labour and blood transfusions were observed in 0.25 and 0.2%, respectively. In comparison with the births at home, we had lower rate of fetal complications for nulliparous women, but not for multiparous women, lower rate for blood transfusions, third and fourth degree perineal trauma and forceps delivery, and higher rate of spontaneous vertex birth, epidural analgesia, and episiotomy. The rate of vacuum extractions and caesarean sections were similar between both the places of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

The tertiary-level obstetric unit is safe place of birth for women with low-risk pregnancies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一家单一的三级大学医院中低风险妊娠女性足月时的围产期和产妇结局。

患者与方法

我们对2010年1月至2014年12月在马格德堡大学妇女医院分娩的低风险妊娠女性进行了一项回顾性队列研究。将数据与布罗克赫斯特等人2011年发表的数据进行了比较。

结果

在6052名接受调查的女性中,根据英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)标准,有2014名被归类为低风险,有资格进行分析。观察到94.8%为自然头位分娩。围产期并发症仅2例(0.1%),产妇并发症52例(2.5%)。分别有2.5%、1%和3.1%的病例进行了真空吸引分娩、产钳分娩和剖宫产。37.7%的女性进行了会阴切开术。在所调查的分娩中,0.3%观察到三度和四度会阴创伤。分别有0.25%和0.2%的分娩观察到第三产程并发症和输血情况。与在家分娩相比,初产妇的胎儿并发症发生率较低,但经产妇并非如此;输血、三度和四度会阴创伤以及产钳分娩的发生率较低;自然头位分娩、硬膜外镇痛和会阴切开术的发生率较高。两个分娩地点的真空吸引分娩率和剖宫产率相似。

结论

对于低风险妊娠女性,三级产科单位是安全的分娩场所。

相似文献

1
Perinatal and maternal outcomes at term in low-risk pregnancies according to NICE criteria: comparison between a tertiary obstetrical hospital and midwife-attended units.根据英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)标准,低风险妊娠足月时的围产期及产妇结局:三级产科医院与助产士护理机构的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;296(2):223-229. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4423-8. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.低危医院分娩中助产护理与产科护理的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521.
3
Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands.计划分娩地点对低风险女性产科干预措施及孕产妇结局的影响:荷兰的一项队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1130-6.
4
The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit.在产科转诊单位中,由助产士主导的低风险产妇分娩结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Sep;28(13):1530-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.958995. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcome of births planned in alongside midwifery units: a cohort study from a tertiary center in Germany.在助产士单位中计划分娩的母婴结局:来自德国一所三级中心的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02962-4.
6
Comparison of midwife-led and obstetrician-led care in Lithuania: A retrospective cohort study.立陶宛助产士主导护理与产科医生主导护理的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Oct;65:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.健康低风险孕妇的分娩地点与围产儿和产妇结局:英国Birthplace 前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400.
8
Obstetrician involvement in planned midwife-led births: a cohort study in an obstetric department of a University Hospital in Switzerland.产科医生参与计划中的助产士主导分娩:瑞士一所大学医院产科的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04209-2.
9
Midwife-led maternity care in Ireland - a retrospective cohort study.爱尔兰由助产士主导的孕产妇护理——一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1285-9.
10
Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.医院层面助产士接生比例与产科手术利用情况之间的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 16.