J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000155.
Reports an error in "The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power" by Christopher J. Soto and Oliver P. John (, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 7, 2016, np). In the article, all citations to McCrae and Costa (2008), except for the instance in which it appears in the first paragraph of the introduction, should instead appear as McCrae and Costa (2010). The complete citation should read as follows: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. The attribution to the BFI-2 items that appears in the Table 6 note should read as follows: BFI-2 items adapted from "Conceptualization, Development, and Initial Validation of the Big Five Inventory-2," by C. J. Soto and O. P. John, 2015, Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality. Copyright 2015 by Oliver P. John and Christopher J. Soto. The complete citation in the References list should appear as follows: Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2015, June). Conceptualization, development, and initial validation of the Big Five Inventory-2. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, St. Louis, MO. Available from http://www.colby.edu/psych/personality-lab/ All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-17156-001.) Three studies were conducted to develop and validate the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2), a major revision of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Study 1 specified a hierarchical model of personality structure with 15 facet traits nested within the Big Five domains, and developed a preliminary item pool to measure this structure. Study 2 used conceptual and empirical criteria to construct the BFI-2 domain and facet scales from the preliminary item pool. Study 3 used data from 2 validation samples to evaluate the BFI-2's measurement properties and substantive relations with self-reported and peer-reported criteria. The results of these studies indicate that the BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure, and an important advance over the original BFI. Specifically, the BFI-2 introduces a robust hierarchical structure, controls for individual differences in acquiescent responding, and provides greater bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power than the original BFI, while still retaining the original measure's conceptual focus, brevity, and ease of understanding. The BFI-2 therefore offers valuable new opportunities for research examining the structure, assessment, development, and life outcomes of personality traits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了克里斯托弗·J·索托（Christopher J. Soto）和奥利弗·P·约翰（Oliver P. John）的文章“下一个五大量表（BFI-2）：开发和评估具有 15 个方面的分层模型，以提高带宽，保真度和预测能力”中的错误（，高级在线出版物，2016 年 4 月 7 日，np）。在本文中，除了在引言第一段中出现的情况外，对 McCrae 和 Costa（2008）的所有引用都应改为 McCrae 和 Costa（2010）。完整的引文应如下所示：McCrae，RR和 Costa，PT（2010）。NEO 清单专业手册。卢茨，佛罗里达州：心理评估资源。表 6 注释中出现的 BFI-2 项的归因应改为：BFI-2 项改编自 C. J. Soto 和 O. P. John 的“Big Five Inventory-2 的概念化，开发和初步验证”，2015 年，在人格研究协会的两年一次会议上提交的论文。版权所有 2015 年由 Oliver P. John 和 Christopher J. Soto。参考文献列表中的完整引文应如下所示：Soto，CJ 和 John，OP（2015 年 6 月）。Big Five Inventory-2 的概念化，开发和初步验证。在人格研究协会两年一次的会议上提交的论文，圣路易斯，密苏里州。可从 http://www.colby.edu/psych/personality-lab/获得。所有版本的文章均已更正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2016-17156-001 中。）进行了三项研究，以开发和验证 Big Five Inventory-2（BFI-2），这是对 Big Five Inventory（BFI）的重大修订。研究 1 指定了人格结构的层次模型，其中包含 15 个嵌套在大五领域内的特质，并开发了一个初步的项目库来衡量该结构。研究 2 使用概念和经验标准从初步的项目库中构建 BFI-2 领域和方面量表。研究 3 使用来自 2 个验证样本的数据，评估了 BFI-2 的测量特性及其与自我报告和同伴报告标准的实质性关系。这些研究的结果表明，BFI-2 是一种可靠且有效的人格测量工具，并且是对原始 BFI 的重要改进。具体来说，BFI-2 引入了强大的层次结构，控制了默许反应的个体差异，并提供了比原始 BFI 更高的带宽，保真度和预测能力，同时仍保留了原始测量的概念重点，简洁性和易于理解性。因此，BFI-2 为研究人格特质的结构，评估，发展和生活结果提供了宝贵的新机会。（PsycINFO 数据库记录（c）2017 APA，保留所有权利）。
