• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴幼儿期医疗连续性与早期健康结局

Continuity of Care in Infancy and Early Childhood Health Outcomes.

作者信息

Enlow Elizabeth, Passarella Molly, Lorch Scott A

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0339. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2017-0339
PMID:28617244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5495533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Continuity of care is a key aspect of the patient-centered medical home and improves pediatric outcomes. Health care reform requires high-quality data to demonstrate its continued value. We hypothesized that increased provider continuity in infancy will reduce urgent health care use and increase receipt of preventive services in early childhood.

METHODS

Continuity, using the Usual Provider of Care measure, was calculated across all primary care encounters during the first year of life in a prospectively-constructed cohort of 17 773 infants receiving primary care from birth through 3 years at 30 clinics. Health care utilization and preventive care outcomes were measured from ages 1 to 3 years. Confounders, including chronic conditions, number of sick visits in the first year, socioeconomic status, and site, were addressed by using multivariable regression models incorporating a propensity score.

RESULTS

Demographics associated with the lowest continuity quartile included white race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.64), Medicaid insurance (aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.23-1.61), and asthma (aOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.30-1.93). Lower continuity was associated with more ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.74; 95% CI 1.49-5.03), ambulatory sick visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.11), and lower odds of lead screening (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.79). These associations were stronger for children with chronic conditions. Continuity measured during well visits was not associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuity may improve care quality and prevent high-cost health encounters, especially for children with chronic conditions. Novel solutions are needed to improve continuity in the medical home.

摘要

背景与目的

连续性医疗是以人为本的医疗之家的关键要素,可改善儿科治疗效果。医疗改革需要高质量数据来证明其持续价值。我们推测,婴儿期医疗服务提供者连续性的提高将减少紧急医疗服务的使用,并增加幼儿期预防性服务的接受率。

方法

在一个前瞻性构建的队列中,对17773名从出生到3岁在30家诊所接受初级保健的婴儿,计算其出生后第一年所有初级保健就诊过程中的连续性(采用常规医疗服务提供者测量法)。从1岁到3岁测量医疗服务利用情况和预防性保健结果。通过使用纳入倾向评分的多变量回归模型,对包括慢性病、第一年就诊次数、社会经济地位和诊所地点等混杂因素进行了处理。

结果

与连续性最低四分位数相关的人口统计学特征包括白人种族(调整后的优势比[aOR]为1.43;95%置信区间[CI]为1.25 - 1.64)、医疗补助保险(aOR为1.41;95%CI为1.23 - 1.61)和哮喘(aOR为1.59;95%CI为1.30 - 1.93)。连续性较低与更多的非卧床护理敏感型住院(调整后的发病率比为2.74;95%CI为1.49 - 5.03)、非卧床就诊(调整后的发病率比为1.08;95%CI为1.05 - 1.11)以及较低的铅筛查几率(aOR为0.61;95%CI为0.46 - 0.79)相关。这些关联在患有慢性病的儿童中更强。在健康检查期间测量的连续性与结果无关。

结论

连续性可能会提高医疗质量并预防高成本的医疗遭遇,特别是对于患有慢性病的儿童。需要新的解决方案来提高医疗之家中的连续性。

相似文献

1
Continuity of Care in Infancy and Early Childhood Health Outcomes.婴幼儿期医疗连续性与早期健康结局
Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0339. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
Effects of continuity of care in infancy on receipt of lead, anemia, and tuberculosis screening.婴儿期连续性护理对铅、贫血和结核病筛查接受情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e399-406. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1497.
3
Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood.幼儿期初级保健临床医生的连续性。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1917-25.
4
The role of provider continuity in preventing hospitalizations.医疗服务连续性在预防住院方面的作用。
Arch Fam Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;7(4):352-7. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.4.352.
5
Preterm Infant Attendance at Health Supervision Visits.早产婴儿健康监督访视的出勤情况。
Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):e794-802. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0745.
6
Well-child care in infancy and healthcare services utilization from birth to 6 years by late preterm children receiving Medicaid benefits.接受医疗补助的晚期早产儿从出生到6岁期间的婴儿期健康儿童保健及医疗服务利用情况。
South Med J. 2013 Feb;106(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182826371.
7
Scattering of primary care: doctor switching and utilization of health care by children on fee-for-service Medicaid.初级保健的分散化:按服务收费的医疗补助计划下儿童更换医生及医疗服务利用情况
J Urban Health. 1999 Sep;76(3):322-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02345671.
8
Continuity of care and delivery of ambulatory services to children in community health clinics.社区卫生诊所为儿童提供的连续性医疗服务及门诊服务。
J Community Health. 1996 Jun;21(3):159-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01557996.
9
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
10
Early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment and infant health outcomes in Medicaid-insured infants in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州医疗补助参保婴儿的早期定期筛查、诊断、治疗及婴儿健康结局
J Pediatr. 2007 Oct;151(4):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Treatment Adherence in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: The Impact of the Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12 Score on Metabolic Control.评估1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的治疗依从性:依从性始于知识-12评分对代谢控制的影响。
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;12(4):463. doi: 10.3390/children12040463.
2
Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy in Parents of Toddlers-A Cross-Sectional Study.幼儿父母的健康素养与自我效能——一项横断面研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Feb;12(2):e70078. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70078.
3
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Text Messages to Improve Well-Child Visit Attendance After No-Show.短信干预提高儿童就诊失约后就诊率的初步随机对照试验
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Nov-Dec;24(8):1210-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
The Wall of Evidence for Continuity of Care: How Many More Bricks Do We Need?连续性护理的证据之墙:我们还需要多少块砖?
Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):184-186. doi: 10.1370/afm.3116.
5
Providing culturally responsive care in a pediatric setting: are our trainees ready?在儿科环境中提供文化响应式护理:我们的受训者准备好了吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04651-0.
6
Quality of Care for Latinx Children with Asthma: Associations with Language Concordance and Continuity of Care.拉美裔儿童哮喘护理质量:与语言一致性和医疗照护连续性的关联。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Aug 9;36(4):616-625. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220379R1. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures can advance population health, but is access to instruments and use equitable?患者报告的结局指标有助于促进人群健康,但获取相关工具的途径以及使用是否公平呢?
Front Pediatr. 2022 Oct 18;10:892947. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.892947. eCollection 2022.
8
"First Five" Quality Improvement Program Increases Adherence and Continuity with Well-child Care.“前五个”质量改进计划提高了儿童健康保健的依从性和连续性。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Dec 15;6(6):e484. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000484. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
9
Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Quality Improvement Principles: A New York City Pediatric Primary Care Experience.运用质量改进原则应对新冠疫情:纽约市儿科初级保健经验
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 May 5;6(3):e402. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000402. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
10
Understanding Variation In Nonurgent Pediatric Emergency Department Use In Communities With Concentrated Disadvantage.理解在资源集中匮乏的社区中,非紧急儿科急诊就诊的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jan;40(1):156-164. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00675.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated With Resident Continuity in Ambulatory Training Practices.门诊培训实践中与住院医师连续性相关的因素。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):532-540. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00755.1.
2
How Avoidable are Hospitalizations for Children With Medical Complexity? Understanding Parent Perspectives.患有复杂疾病的儿童住院情况在多大程度上是可以避免的?了解家长的看法。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Aug;16(6):579-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
3
Predictors of Emergency Department Utilization Among Children in Vulnerable Families.弱势家庭儿童急诊科就诊的预测因素
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Dec;33(12):765-769. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000658.
4
Preterm Infant Attendance at Health Supervision Visits.早产婴儿健康监督访视的出勤情况。
Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):e794-802. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0745.
5
Emergency Care of Children with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in the United States.美国门诊护理敏感型疾病患儿的急诊护理
J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):729-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 May 30.
6
Primary care access and emergency room use among older veterans.老年退伍军人的初级医疗服务获取与急诊室使用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S689-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2678-8.
7
Measuring Care Continuity: A Comparison of Claims-based Methods.衡量护理连续性:基于索赔方法的比较。
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):e30-4. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000018.
8
Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults.连续性护理与老年人可预防住院风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11;173(20):1879-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10059.
9
Relationship between longitudinal continuity of primary care and likelihood of death: analysis of national insurance data.初级保健的纵向连续性与死亡可能性之间的关系:国家保险数据分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 22;8(8):e71669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071669. eCollection 2013.
10
Continuity of care, medication adherence, and health care outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal analysis.新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的连续性护理、药物依从性和医疗保健结局:纵向分析。
Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3):231-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da5b9.