Gill J M, Mainous A G
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Del., USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;7(4):352-7. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.4.352.
To examine the association between provider continuity and future hospitalization in a Medicaid population, and to determine if this association is greater for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.
Analysis of paid claims to the Delaware Medicaid program during a 2-year period (July 1, 1993, to June 30, 1995). Continuity with a single provider during year 1 of the study was computed for each participant.
A total of 13,495 continuously enrolled fee-for-service Medicaid patients aged 0 to 64 years who had made at least 3 ambulatory physician visits during the first year of the study.
Likelihood of hospitalization in year 2 of the study for all conditions and for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.
The mean continuity score was 0.50 in year 1 and 11.9% of patients were hospitalized in year 2. After controlling for demographics, number of ambulatory visits, and case mix, higher provider continuity was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization for any condition (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.69). For chronic ambulatory care-sensitive conditions there was a similar association between provider continuity and hospitalization (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88), but for acute ambulatory care-sensitive conditions there was no significant association (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.48-1.34).
Continuity of care with a provider is associated with a decreased future likelihood of hospitalization in the Delaware Medicaid population. This suggests that policies that encourage patients to concentrate their care with a single provider may lead to lower hospitalization rates and possibly lower health care costs. This study does not support the hypothesis that a certain set of conditions are particularly ambulatory care sensitive.
研究医疗补助计划人群中医疗服务提供者连续性与未来住院情况之间的关联,并确定这种关联对于非卧床护理敏感疾病是否更强。
对特拉华医疗补助计划在两年期间(1993年7月1日至1995年6月30日)的付费索赔进行分析。计算了研究第一年中每位参与者与单一医疗服务提供者的连续性。
共有13495名年龄在0至64岁之间、连续参保的按服务收费的医疗补助计划患者,他们在研究的第一年至少进行了3次门诊就诊。
研究第二年中所有疾病以及非卧床护理敏感疾病的住院可能性。
第一年的平均连续性得分是0.50,第二年有11.9%的患者住院。在控制了人口统计学因素、门诊就诊次数和病例组合后,更高的医疗服务提供者连续性与任何疾病的住院可能性降低相关(优势比[OR]=0.56;95%置信区间[CI],0.46 - 0.69)。对于慢性非卧床护理敏感疾病,医疗服务提供者连续性与住院之间存在类似关联(OR = 0.54;95% CI,0.34 - 0.88),但对于急性非卧床护理敏感疾病则无显著关联(OR = 0.80;95% CI,0.48 - 1.34)。
在特拉华医疗补助计划人群中,与医疗服务提供者的护理连续性与未来住院可能性降低相关。这表明鼓励患者集中在单一医疗服务提供者处接受护理的政策可能会降低住院率,并可能降低医疗成本。本研究不支持某一组疾病对非卧床护理特别敏感的假设。