Sequenom, San Diego, California, USA.
Genet Med. 2017 Dec;19(12):1332-1337. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.56. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PurposeInvasive diagnostic prenatal testing can provide the most comprehensive information about the genetic status of a fetus. Noninvasive prenatal screening methods, especially when using cell-free DNA (cfDNA), are often limited to reporting only on trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies. This can leave a significant number of chromosomal and subchromosomal copy-number variations undetected. In 2015, we launched a new genome-wide cfDNA screening test that has the potential to narrow this detection gap.MethodsHere, we review the results from the first 10,000 cases submitted to the Sequenom clinical laboratory for genome-wide cfDNA screening.ResultsThe high-risk indication for this cohort differed compared with standard cfDNA screening. More samples were submitted with ultrasound indications (25% compared with 13% for standard cfDNA screening) and fewer for advanced maternal age (51% for genome-wide screening versus 68% for standard cfDNA screening). A total of 554 positive calls were made, of which 164 were detectable only via genome-wide analysis.ConclusionThis reports indicates a difference in utilization compared with standard cfDNA screening, where positivity rates are higher and a large subset of positive calls could not have been made using standard cfDNA screening.
目的
有创性诊断性产前检测可提供胎儿遗传状况的最全面信息。而非侵入性产前筛查方法,尤其是当使用游离胎儿 DNA (cfDNA) 时,通常仅限于报告 21、18 和 13 三体以及性染色体非整倍体。这可能会导致大量染色体和亚染色体拷贝数变异无法被检测到。2015 年,我们推出了一种新的全基因组 cfDNA 筛查测试,它有可能缩小这种检测差距。
方法
在这里,我们回顾了提交给 Sequenom 临床实验室进行全基因组 cfDNA 筛查的前 10000 例病例的结果。
结果
与标准 cfDNA 筛查相比,该队列的高风险指征有所不同。与标准 cfDNA 筛查相比,有更多的样本是基于超声指征提交的(25%比 13%),而基于高龄产妇的则更少(全基因组筛查为 51%,标准 cfDNA 筛查为 68%)。共发现 554 个阳性结果,其中 164 个仅通过全基因组分析才能检测到。
结论
与标准 cfDNA 筛查相比,该研究表明利用率存在差异,全基因组筛查的阳性率更高,且很大一部分阳性结果无法通过标准 cfDNA 筛查检测到。