Suppr超能文献

心房颤动与心肌梗死、全因死亡率和心力衰竭风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Atrial fibrillation and the risk for myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality and heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

1 Department of Cardiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norway.

2 Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Sep;24(14):1555-1566. doi: 10.1177/2047487317715769. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

Abstract

Background In contemporary atrial fibrillation trials most deaths are cardiac related, whereas stroke and bleeding represent only a small subset of deaths. We aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of cardiac events and all-cause mortality in individuals with atrial fibrillation compared to no atrial fibrillation. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 1 January 2006 and 21 October 2016. Methods Four databases were searched. Studies had follow-up of at least 500 stable patients for either cardiac endpoints or all-cause mortality for 12 months or longer. Publication bias was evaluated and random effects models were used to synthesise the results. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results A total of 15 cohort studies was included. Analyses indicated that atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk (RR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.85), all-cause mortality (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.50-2.54) and heart failure (RR 4.62, 95% CI 3.13-6.83). Coronary heart disease at baseline was associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction and explained 57% of the heterogeneity. A prospective cohort design accounted for 25% of all-cause mortality heterogeneity. Due to there being fewer than 10 studies, sources of heterogeneity were inconclusive for heart failure. Conclusions Atrial fibrillation seems to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction in patients without coronary heart disease and an increased risk of, all-cause mortality and heart failure in patients with and without coronary heart disease.

摘要

背景

在当代心房颤动试验中,大多数死亡是与心脏相关的,而中风和出血仅占死亡的一小部分。我们旨在评估与无心房颤动的个体相比,患有心房颤动的个体发生心脏事件和全因死亡率的长期风险。

设计

对 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 10 月 21 日期间发表的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。

方法

检索了四个数据库。研究随访至少 500 例稳定的患者,随访时间至少为 12 个月,随访终点为心脏事件或全因死亡率。评估了发表偏倚,并使用随机效应模型来综合结果。通过亚组和荟萃回归分析检查研究之间的异质性。

结果

共纳入 15 项队列研究。分析表明,心房颤动与心肌梗死(相对风险 1.54,95%置信区间 1.26-1.85)、全因死亡率(相对风险 1.95,95%置信区间 1.50-2.54)和心力衰竭(相对风险 4.62,95%置信区间 3.13-6.83)的风险增加相关。基线时患有冠心病与心肌梗死风险降低相关,并解释了 57%的异质性。前瞻性队列设计占全因死亡率异质性的 25%。由于研究数量少于 10 项,心力衰竭的异质性来源尚无定论。

结论

在无冠心病的患者中,心房颤动似乎与随后发生心肌梗死的风险增加相关,在有或无冠心病的患者中,与全因死亡率和心力衰竭的风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e65/5598874/54772524ed49/10.1177_2047487317715769-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验