Princeton University.
University of California, San Diego.
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):e364-e381. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12858. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Although infants say "no" early, older children have difficulty understanding its truth-functional meaning. Two experiments investigate whether this difficulty stems from the infelicity of negative sentences out of the blue. In Experiment 1, given supportive discourse, 3-year-olds (N = 16) understood both affirmative and negative sentences. However, with sentence types randomized, 2-year-olds (N = 28) still failed. In Experiment 2, affirmative and negative sentences were blocked. Two-year-olds (N = 28) now succeeded, but only when affirmatives were presented first. Thus, although discourse felicity seems the primary bottleneck for 3-year-olds' understanding of negation, 2-year-olds struggle with its semantic processing. Contrary to accounts where negatives are understood via affirmatives, both sentence types were processed equally quickly, suggesting previously reported asymmetries are due to pragmatic accommodation, not semantic processing.
尽管婴儿很早就会说“不”,但年龄较大的孩子却很难理解其真值语义。两项实验研究了这种困难是否源于突如其来的否定句的不适宜性。在实验 1 中,在有支持性话语的情况下,3 岁儿童(N=16)理解了肯定句和否定句。然而,当句子类型随机化时,2 岁儿童(N=28)仍然失败。在实验 2 中,肯定句和否定句被分组。现在,2 岁儿童(N=28)成功了,但只有在首先呈现肯定句的情况下才成功。因此,尽管话语适宜性似乎是 3 岁儿童理解否定的主要瓶颈,但 2 岁儿童在否定的语义处理上存在困难。与否定句通过肯定句来理解的解释相反,两种句子类型的处理速度相同,这表明之前报道的不对称性是由于语用适应,而不是语义处理。