Swartz Jo S, Amos Karen E, Brindas Mirna, Girling Linda G, Ruth Graham M
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Department of Nursing, Child Health, Children's Hospital, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Aug;27(8):856-862. doi: 10.1111/pan.13189. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Perioperative care for children with autism spectrum disorder may be challenging. Previous investigators recommend development of an individualized perioperative management plan with caregiver involvement.
The primary goal was to determine the usefulness of an individualized plan based on the decision to provide preoperative sedation stratified by autism spectrum severity level. Secondary goals were to assess the effectiveness of the plan based on subjective assessment of patient behavior at induction of anesthesia and caregiver satisfaction.
We developed an individualized plan for each child with autism spectrum disorder scheduled for anesthesia. Children were categorized by autism spectrum disorder severity level. With institutional ethics approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review to document need for preoperative sedation, sedation stratified by autism spectrum disorder severity level, behavior at induction, and caregiver satisfaction.
Between 2012 and 2014, we successfully prepared a plan for 246 (98%) of 251 surgical or diagnostic procedures in 224 patients. Severity level was distributed as 45% Severity Level 1 and Asperger's, 25% Severity Level 2, and 30% Severity Level 3. The majority (90%) of cases were scheduled as day surgery. Preoperative sedation increased with increasing severity level: Severity Level 1 (21%) or Asperger's (31%), Severity Level 2 (44%), and Severity Level 3 (56%). The odds ratio for sedation use was 5.5 [CI: 2.6-11.5, P<.001] with Severity Level 3 vs Severity Level 1 patients. Cooperation at induction of anesthesia was 90% overall with preoperative sedation administered to 94 (38%) of the entire cohort. Cooperation was greatest in Severity Level 1 (98%) and Asperger's patients (93%) and somewhat less (85%) in patients in Severity Levels 2 and 3. The plan was helpful to guide sedation choices as cooperation did not differ between sedated and unsedated children at any severity level (overall χ =2.87 P=.09). Satisfaction among caregivers contacted was 98%.
The results suggest that an individualized plan is helpful in the perioperative management of children with autism spectrum disorder and that knowledge of autism spectrum disorder severity level may be helpful in determining the need for preoperative sedation.
自闭症谱系障碍患儿的围手术期护理可能具有挑战性。先前的研究人员建议制定个性化的围手术期管理计划,并让照顾者参与其中。
主要目标是根据是否决定提供术前镇静(按自闭症谱系严重程度分层)来确定个性化计划的有用性。次要目标是根据麻醉诱导时对患者行为的主观评估以及照顾者的满意度来评估该计划的有效性。
我们为每例计划接受麻醉的自闭症谱系障碍患儿制定了个性化计划。根据自闭症谱系障碍严重程度对患儿进行分类。经机构伦理批准,我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以记录术前镇静的需求、按自闭症谱系障碍严重程度分层的镇静情况、诱导时的行为以及照顾者的满意度。
在2012年至2014年期间,我们成功为224例患者的251例手术或诊断程序中的246例(98%)制定了计划。严重程度分布为:45%为1级严重程度和阿斯伯格综合征,25%为2级严重程度,30%为3级严重程度。大多数(90%)病例安排为日间手术。术前镇静随着严重程度的增加而增加:1级严重程度(21%)或阿斯伯格综合征(31%)、2级严重程度(44%)、3级严重程度(56%)。3级严重程度患者与1级严重程度患者相比,使用镇静的优势比为5.5[置信区间:2.6 - 11.5,P <.001]。在整个队列中,94例(38%)接受术前镇静的患者麻醉诱导时的总体合作率为90%。1级严重程度(98%)和阿斯伯格综合征患者(93%)的合作率最高,2级和3级严重程度患者稍低(85%)。该计划有助于指导镇静选择,因为在任何严重程度水平下,接受镇静和未接受镇静的儿童之间的合作情况没有差异(总体χ = 2.87,P =.09)。被联系的照顾者的满意度为98%。
结果表明,个性化计划有助于自闭症谱系障碍患儿的围手术期管理,并且了解自闭症谱系障碍严重程度水平可能有助于确定术前镇静的需求。