Oncology Data Science (ODysSey) Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Mol Oncol. 2017 Sep;11(9):1263-1272. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12099. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Sequencing of tumors is now routine and guides personalized cancer therapy. Mutant allele fractions (MAFs, or the 'mutation dose') of a driver gene may reveal the genomic structure of tumors and influence response to targeted therapies. We performed a comprehensive analysis of MAFs of driver alterations in unpaired primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) at our institution from 2010 to 2015 and studied their potential clinical relevance. Of 763 CRC samples, 622 had detailed annotation on overall survival in the metastatic setting (OSmet) and 89 received targeted agents matched to KRAS (MEK inhibitors), BRAF (BRAF inhibitors), or PIK3CA mutations (PI3K pathway inhibitors). MAFs of each variant were normalized for tumor purity in the sample (adjMAFs). We found lower adjMAFs for BRAF and PIK3CA than for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF non-V600 variants. TP53 and BRAF adjMAFs were higher in metastases as compared to primary tumors, and high KRAS adjMAFs were found in CRC metastases of patients with KRAS wild-type primary tumors previously exposed to EGFR antibodies. Patients with RAS- or BRAF -mutated tumors, irrespective of adjMAFs, had worse OSmet. There was no significant association between adjMAFs and time to progression on targeted therapies matched to KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA mutations, potentially related to the limited antitumor activity of the employed drugs (overall response rate of 4.5%). In conclusion, the lower BRAF and PIK3CA adjMAFs in subsets of primary CRC tumors indicate subclonality of these driver genes. Differences in adjMAFs between metastases and primary tumors suggest that approved therapies may result in selection of BRAF - and KRAS-resistant clones and an increase in genomic heterogeneity with acquired TP53 alterations. Despite significant differences in prognosis according to mutations in driver oncogenes, adjMAFs levels did not impact on survival and did not help predict benefit with matched targeted agents in the metastatic setting.
肿瘤测序现在已成为常规操作,并指导着癌症的个体化治疗。驱动基因的突变等位基因分数(MAF,即“突变剂量”)可以揭示肿瘤的基因组结构,并影响对靶向治疗的反应。我们对 2010 年至 2015 年在本机构未经配对的原发性和转移性结直肠癌(CRC)中驱动基因改变的 MAF 进行了全面分析,并研究了其潜在的临床相关性。在 763 例 CRC 样本中,622 例在转移性环境中具有详细的总生存期(OSmet)注释,89 例接受了与 KRAS(MEK 抑制剂)、BRAF(BRAF 抑制剂)或 PIK3CA 突变(PI3K 通路抑制剂)匹配的靶向药物。每个变体的 MAF 均根据样本中的肿瘤纯度进行了归一化(adjMAFs)。我们发现 BRAF 和 PIK3CA 的 adjMAFs 低于 KRAS、NRAS 和非 V600 BRAF 变体。与原发性肿瘤相比,转移瘤中 TP53 和 BRAF 的 adjMAFs 更高,而先前接受过 EGFR 抗体治疗的 KRAS 野生型原发性肿瘤的 CRC 转移瘤中发现了高 KRAS adjMAFs。无论 adjMAFs 如何,RAS 或 BRAF 突变的肿瘤患者的 OSmet 更差。KRAS、BRAF 或 PIK3CA 突变匹配的靶向治疗中,adjMAFs 与无进展时间之间没有显著关联,这可能与所使用药物的有限抗肿瘤活性有关(总缓解率为 4.5%)。总之,原发性 CRC 肿瘤亚群中 BRAF 和 PIK3CA 的较低 adjMAFs 表明这些驱动基因的亚克隆性。转移瘤和原发性肿瘤之间 adjMAFs 的差异表明,已批准的治疗方法可能导致 BRAF 和 KRAS 耐药克隆的选择,并随着获得性 TP53 改变而增加基因组异质性。尽管根据驱动癌基因的突变,预后有显著差异,但 adjMAFs 水平并未影响生存,也无法帮助预测转移性环境中匹配靶向药物的获益。