Suppr超能文献

细节决定成败?一项针对完美主义的基于互联网的引导式认知行为疗法的随机对照试验。

Is the devil in the detail? A randomised controlled trial of guided internet-based CBT for perfectionism.

机构信息

University College London, England, United Kingdom.

Flinders University, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

An internet guided self-help cognitive-behavioural treatment (ICBT) for perfectionism was recently found to be effective (see this issue). Such studies stand in need of replication. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes and predictors of change when the treatment is delivered in a UK setting. A total of 120 people (Mean = 28.9 years; 79% female) were randomised to receive ICBT or wait-list control over 12 weeks (trial registration: NCT02756871). While there were strong similarities between the current study and its Swedish counterpart, there were also important differences in procedural details. There was a significant impact of the intervention on the primary outcome measure (Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, Concern over Mistakes subscale) and also on the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (between group effect sizes d = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.60-1.36) and d = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.66-1.43) respectively using intent-to-treat analyses). Unlike the Swedish study, there was significant non-engagement and non-completion of modules with 71% of participants completing fewer than half the modules. The number of modules completed moderated the rate of change in clinical perfectionism over time. In conclusion, the study indicates the intervention is effective in a UK setting but highlighted the importance of procedural details to optimise retention.

摘要

最近发现,一种互联网指导的自助认知行为治疗(ICBT)对完美主义有效(见本期)。此类研究需要重复。本研究旨在报告在英国环境下提供治疗时的结果和变化预测因素。共有 120 人(平均年龄为 28.9 岁;79%为女性)被随机分配接受 ICBT 或 12 周的候补名单对照(试验注册:NCT02756871)。虽然当前研究与其瑞典对应研究有很强的相似性,但在程序细节上也有重要差异。干预对主要结果测量(Frost 多维完美主义量表,对错误的关注子量表)和临床完美主义问卷(组间效应大小 d=0.98(95%CI:0.60-1.36)和 d=1.04(95%CI:0.66-1.43)分别使用意向治疗分析)有显著影响。与瑞典研究不同的是,模块的参与度和完成度显著降低,只有 71%的参与者完成了不到一半的模块。完成模块的数量调节了随着时间的推移临床完美主义变化的速度。总之,该研究表明该干预措施在英国环境下有效,但强调了程序细节对优化保留率的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验