1 Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
Assessment. 2019 Jun;26(4):661-669. doi: 10.1177/1073191117714558. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
The present study investigated the comparability of laptop computer- and tablet-based administration modes for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Employing a counterbalanced within-subjects design, the MMPI-2-RF was administered via both modes to a sample of college undergraduates ( N = 133). Administration modes were compared in terms of mean scale scores, internal consistency, test-retest consistency, external validity, and administration time. Mean scores were generally similar, and scores produced via both methods appeared approximately equal in terms of internal consistency and test-retest consistency. Scores from the two modalities also evidenced highly similar patterns of associations with external criteria. Notably, tablet administration of the MMPI-2-RF was substantially longer than laptop administration in the present study (mean difference 7.2 minutes, Cohen's d = .95). Overall, results suggest that varying administration mode between laptop and tablet has a negligible influence on MMPI-2-RF scores, providing evidence that these modes of administration can be considered psychometrically equivalent.
本研究调查了基于笔记本电脑和平板电脑的明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2 修订版（MMPI-2-RF）的管理模式的可比性。采用平衡的被试内设计，将 MMPI-2-RF 通过两种模式同时施测于一组大学生样本（N=133）。从平均量表分数、内部一致性、重测一致性、外部效度和管理时间等方面比较了管理模式。平均分数通常相似，并且两种方法产生的分数在内部一致性和重测一致性方面似乎大致相等。两种方式的分数与外部标准的关联模式也非常相似。值得注意的是，在本研究中，平板电脑施测 MMPI-2-RF 的时间明显长于笔记本电脑（平均差异 7.2 分钟，Cohen's d=.95）。总体而言，结果表明，在笔记本电脑和平板电脑之间改变管理模式对 MMPI-2-RF 分数的影响可以忽略不计，这为这些管理模式可被视为心理测量等效提供了证据。
