Phipatanakul Wanda, Koutrakis Petros, Coull Brent A, Kang Choong-Min, Wolfson Jack M, Ferguson Stephen T, Petty Carter R, Samnaliev Mihail, Cunningham Amparito, Sheehan William J, Gaffin Jonathan M, Baxi Sachin N, Lai Peggy S, Permaul Perdita, Liang Liming, Thorne Peter S, Adamkiewicz Gary, Brennan Kasey J, Baccarelli Andrea A, Gold Diane R
Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood in the United States, causes significant morbidity, particularly in the inner-city, and accounts for billions of dollars in health care utilization. Home environments are established sources of exposure that exacerbate symptoms and home-based interventions are effective. However, elementary school children spend 7 to 12h a day in school, primarily in one classroom. From the observational School Inner-City Asthma Study we learned that student classroom-specific exposures are associated with worsening asthma symptoms and decline in lung function. We now embark on a randomized, blinded, sham-controlled school environmental intervention trial, built on our extensively established school/community partnerships, to determine the efficacy of a school-based intervention to improve asthma control. This factorial school/classroom based environmental intervention will plan to enroll 300 students with asthma from multiple classrooms in 40 northeastern inner-city elementary schools. Schools will be randomized to receive either integrated pest management versus control and classrooms within these schools to receive either air purifiers or sham control. The primary outcome is asthma symptoms during the school year. This study is an unprecedented opportunity to test whether a community of children can benefit from school or classroom environmental interventions. If effective, this will have great impact as an efficient, cost-effective intervention for inner city children with asthma and may have broad public policy implications.
哮喘是美国儿童中最常见的慢性疾病,会导致严重的发病率,尤其是在市中心地区,并且在医疗保健利用方面耗费数十亿美元。家庭环境是已知的会加剧症状的暴露源,基于家庭的干预措施是有效的。然而,小学生每天在学校度过7到12个小时,主要是在一个教室里。通过观察性的“学校内城哮喘研究”,我们了解到学生在特定教室的暴露情况与哮喘症状恶化和肺功能下降有关。我们现在着手进行一项随机、双盲、假对照的学校环境干预试验,该试验建立在我们广泛建立的学校/社区伙伴关系基础上,以确定基于学校的干预措施改善哮喘控制的效果。这项基于学校/教室的析因环境干预计划将从东北部40所内城小学的多个教室中招募300名哮喘学生。学校将被随机分配接受综合虫害管理或对照,这些学校内的教室将被分配接受空气净化器或假对照。主要结局是学年期间的哮喘症状。这项研究是一个前所未有的机会,来测试一群儿童是否能从学校或教室环境干预中受益。如果有效,这将作为一种针对内城哮喘儿童的高效、经济有效的干预措施产生巨大影响,并且可能具有广泛的公共政策意义。