Unité de toxicologie expérimentale TOXI-PériTox UMR-I 01, Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
PériTOX, UPJV, Institut d'Ingénierie de la Santé-UFR de Médecine, Amiens, France.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Nov 1;123(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00229.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
The aim of the study was twofold: first, to compare the activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) between the population self-declared as electrohypersensitive (EHS) and their matched control individuals without intended exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). The second objective was to determine whether acute exposure to different radiofrequency signals modifies ANS activity in EHS. For that purpose, two different experiments were undertaken, in which ANS activity was assessed through heart rate variability (HRV) and skin conductance (SC). In the first experiment, a comparison between the EHS group ( = 30) and the control group ( = 25) showed that the EHS has an increased number of responses to auditory stimuli as measured by skin conductance activity, and that none of the short-term heart rate variability parameters differ between the two matched study groups. The second experiment, performed in a shielded chamber, involved 10 EHS from the first experiment. The volunteers participated in two different sessions (sham and exposure). The participants were consecutively exposed to four EMF signals (GSM 900, GSM 1800, DECT, and Wi-Fi) at environmental level (1 V/m). The experiment was double blinded and counterbalanced. The HRV variables studied did not differ between the two sessions. Concerning electrodermal activity, the data issued from skin conductance and tonic activity did not differ between the sessions, but showed a time variability. In conclusion, the HRV and SC profiles did not significantly differ between the EHS and control populations under no exposure. Exposure did not have an effect on the ANS parameters we have explored. This study provided analysis on the skin conductance parameters using a newly developed method (peak/min, extraction of skin conductance responses) that had not been performed previously. Additionally, the skin conductance signal was decomposed, considering tonic and phasic activities to be a distinct compound. Moreover, this is the first time a study has been designed into two steps to understand whether the autonomic nervous system is disturbed in the EHS population.
首先,比较自报为电磁超敏(EHS)的人群与未有意暴露于电磁场(EMF)的匹配对照组之间自主神经系统(ANS)的活动。第二个目的是确定急性暴露于不同射频信号是否会改变 EHS 中的 ANS 活动。为此,进行了两项不同的实验,通过心率变异性(HRV)和皮肤电导(SC)来评估 ANS 活动。在第一项实验中,将 EHS 组(n=30)与对照组(n=25)进行比较,结果显示 EHS 对皮肤电活动测量的听觉刺激有更多的反应,并且两组匹配研究对象之间的短期心率变异性参数没有差异。第二项实验在屏蔽室中进行,涉及来自第一项实验的 10 名 EHS。志愿者参加了两个不同的会议(假暴露和暴露)。参与者连续暴露于四种 EMF 信号(GSM900、GSM1800、DECT 和 Wi-Fi)的环境水平(1V/m)。该实验是双盲和平衡的。研究的 HRV 变量在两个会议之间没有差异。关于皮肤电活动,皮肤电导和紧张活动的数据在会议之间没有差异,但显示出时间变异性。总之,在无暴露的情况下,EHS 和对照组人群的 HRV 和 SC 谱没有显著差异。暴露对我们所探索的 ANS 参数没有影响。本研究使用新开发的方法(峰/最小值、皮肤电反应提取)对皮肤电导参数进行了分析,以前没有进行过这种分析。此外,皮肤电信号被分解,考虑到紧张和相位活动是一个不同的化合物。此外,这是第一次设计成两步来研究自主神经系统是否在 EHS 人群中受到干扰。