Suppr超能文献

手法治疗是否具有特定的自主效应?系统评价综述。

Do manual therapies have a specific autonomic effect? An overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Spain National Center, Foundation COME Collaboration, Barcelona, Spain.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre-Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260642. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of manual therapy interventions on the autonomic nervous system have been largely assessed, but with heterogeneous findings regarding the direction of these effects. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews to describe if there is a specific autonomic effect elicited by manual therapy interventions, its relation with the type of technique used and the body region where the intervention was applied.

METHODS

We conducted an overview according to a publicly registered protocol. We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EPISTEMONIKOS and SCOPUS, from their inception to march 2021. We included systematic reviews for which the primary aim of the intervention was to assess the autonomic effect elicited by a manual therapy intervention in either healthy or symptomatic individuals. Two authors independently applied the selection criteria, assessed risk of bias from the included reviews and extracted data. An established model of generalisation guided the data analysis and interpretation.

RESULTS

We included 12 reviews (5 rated as low risk of bias according the ROBIS tool). The findings showed that manual therapies may have an effect on both sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. However, the results from included reviews were inconsistent due to differences in their methodological rigour and how the effects were measured. The reviews with a lower risk of bias could not discriminate the effects depending on the body region to which the technique was applied.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of the specific autonomic effect elicited by manual therapies and its clinical relevance is uncertain. We point out some specific recommendations in order to improve the quality and relevance of future research in this field.

摘要

背景

手动疗法干预对自主神经系统的影响已得到广泛评估,但关于这些影响的方向,研究结果存在差异。我们进行了系统综述概述,以描述手动疗法干预是否会引起特定的自主效应,及其与所使用技术类型和干预应用的身体部位的关系。

方法

我们根据公开注册的方案进行了概述。我们检索了 Cochrane 系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、EPISTEMONIKOS 和 SCOPUS,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 3 月。我们纳入了干预的主要目的是评估手动疗法干预对健康或有症状个体引起的自主效应的系统评价。两名作者独立应用选择标准,评估纳入的综述的偏倚风险,并提取数据。一个既定的推广模型指导数据分析和解释。

结果

我们纳入了 12 篇综述(5 篇根据 ROBIS 工具被评为低偏倚风险)。研究结果表明,手动疗法可能对交感和副交感神经系统都有影响。然而,由于其方法学严谨性和测量效应的方式不同,纳入的综述结果不一致。低偏倚风险的综述无法根据技术应用的身体部位来区分效应。

结论

手动疗法引起的特定自主效应的幅度及其临床相关性尚不确定。我们提出了一些具体建议,以提高该领域未来研究的质量和相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aba/8638932/02c716897932/pone.0260642.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验