• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体道德优越感在修复意图和接近动机中的作用

The Role of Perceived In-group Moral Superiority in Reparative Intentions and Approach Motivation.

作者信息

Szabó Zsolt P, Mészáros Noémi Z, Csertő István

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapest, Hungary.

Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, University of PécsPécs, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 31;8:912. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00912. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00912
PMID:28620333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5450564/
Abstract

Three studies examined how members of a national group react to in-group wrongdoings. We expected that perceived in-group moral superiority would lead to unwillingness to repair the aggression. We also expected that internal-focused emotions such as group-based guilt and group-based shame would predict specific, misdeed-related reparative intentions but not general approach motivation toward the victim groups. In Study 1, facing the in-group's recent aggression, participants who believed that the Hungarians have been more moral throughout their history than members of other nations, used more exonerating cognitions, experienced less in-group critical emotions and showed less willingness to provide reparations for the members of the victim group. Study 2 and Study 3 confirmed most findings of Study 1. Perceived in-group moral superiority directly or indirectly reduced willingness to provide either general or specific reparations, while internally focused in-group critical emotions predicted specific misdeed-related reparative intentions but not general approach motivation. The role of emotional attachment to the in-group is considered.

摘要

三项研究考察了一个国家群体的成员如何应对群体内的不当行为。我们预计,感知到的群体内道德优越感会导致不愿意修复侵害行为。我们还预计,诸如基于群体的内疚和基于群体的羞耻等内聚焦情绪会预测与特定不当行为相关的修复意图,但不会预测对受害群体的一般接近动机。在研究1中,面对群体内近期的侵害行为,那些认为匈牙利人在其历史上比其他国家的成员更有道德的参与者,使用了更多的免责认知,体验到的群体内批判性情绪更少,并且表现出为受害群体成员提供赔偿的意愿更低。研究2和研究3证实了研究1的大多数发现。感知到的群体内道德优越感直接或间接地降低了提供一般或特定赔偿的意愿,而内聚焦的群体内批判性情绪预测了与特定不当行为相关的修复意图,但没有预测一般接近动机。研究还考虑了对群体的情感依恋的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/44351d184464/fpsyg-08-00912-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/4699ce833b1e/fpsyg-08-00912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/2310bfde6968/fpsyg-08-00912-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/a8a85f152ca5/fpsyg-08-00912-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/3a83417fe191/fpsyg-08-00912-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/44351d184464/fpsyg-08-00912-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/4699ce833b1e/fpsyg-08-00912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/2310bfde6968/fpsyg-08-00912-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/a8a85f152ca5/fpsyg-08-00912-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/3a83417fe191/fpsyg-08-00912-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53b/5450564/44351d184464/fpsyg-08-00912-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Perceived In-group Moral Superiority in Reparative Intentions and Approach Motivation.群体道德优越感在修复意图和接近动机中的作用
Front Psychol. 2017 May 31;8:912. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00912. eCollection 2017.
2
Corrigendum: The Role of Perceived In-group Moral Superiority in Reparative Intentions and Approach Motivation.勘误:感知到的内群体道德优越感在修复意图和接近动机中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01442. eCollection 2018.
3
The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations.群体内疚的悖论:国家认同模式、冲突激烈程度以及对群体道德违规行为的反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):698-711. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698.
4
How bodily expressions of emotion after norm violation influence perceivers' moral judgments and prevent social exclusion: A socio-functional approach to nonverbal shame display.违反规范后身体表达的情绪如何影响知觉者的道德判断并防止社会排斥:非言语羞耻展示的社会功能方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232298. eCollection 2020.
5
Cleansing my abuse: A reparative response model of perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior.清洗我的虐待:施虐型主管行为的修复反应模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Sep;103(9):1039-1056. doi: 10.1037/apl0000319. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
Inhibitory control and moral emotions: relations to reparation in early and middle childhood.抑制控制与道德情感:与儿童早期和中期赔偿行为的关系。
J Genet Psychol. 2014 Sep-Dec;175(5-6):511-27. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2014.976535.
7
Gender Differences in Emotion Explain Women's Lower Immoral Intentions and Harsher Moral Condemnation.性别差异在情绪方面的表现可以解释为什么女性的不道德意图较低,对不道德行为的道德谴责也更为严厉。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 May;44(5):653-669. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744525. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
Group-Based Emotions and Support for Reparations: A Meta-analysis.基于群体的情感与对赔偿的支持:一项元分析
Affect Sci. 2021 Aug 24;2(4):363-378. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00055-9. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
A riot on campus: The effects of social identity complexity on emotions and reparative attitudes after ingroup-perpetrated violence.校园骚乱:社会认同复杂性对群体内暴力后情绪和修复态度的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Jan;44(1):50-59. doi: 10.1002/ab.21723. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
10
When feeling bad makes you look good: guilt, shame, and person perception.当感到内疚和羞耻会让你看起来更好:内疚、羞耻和对人的感知。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(3):407-30. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.675879.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making.思考终极牺牲:身份融合引导亲群体情感、认知和道德决策。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 May;106(5):713-27. doi: 10.1037/a0035809.
2
When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion.当群体归属变得个人化:身份融合理论。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):441-56. doi: 10.1037/a0028589. Epub 2012 May 28.
3
Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior.身份融合:极端群体行为中个人身份与社会身份的相互作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):995-1011. doi: 10.1037/a0013668.
4
Remembering historical victimization: collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions.铭记历史上的受害经历:对当前群体内违规行为的集体罪责。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;94(6):988-1006. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.988.
5
Nuestra culpa: collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing.我们的过错:集体罪责与羞耻感作为历史错误行为赔偿的预测因素。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):75-90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75.
6
The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations.群体内疚的悖论:国家认同模式、冲突激烈程度以及对群体道德违规行为的反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):698-711. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698.
7
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.对群体优势的愤怒和内疚解释了政治行动的意愿。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;32(9):1232-45. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289729.
8
Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology.基于群体的内疚感作为道歉承诺的预测指标。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):659-80. doi: 10.1348/014466604X18974.
9
Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities.实施不人道行为中的道德推脱。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(3):193-209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.
10
White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus.白人的负罪感与种族补偿:自我关注的益处与局限
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;29(1):117-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238377.