Suppr超能文献

自然受孕患者与复发性流产的可育患者治疗周期至下次妊娠的时间。

Time to next pregnancy in spontaneous pregnancies versus treatment cycles in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

作者信息

Perfetto Candice O, Murugappan Gayathree, Lathi Ruth B

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University Medical Center, 900 Welch Rd, Suite 15, Palo Alto, CA USA 94304.

出版信息

Fertil Res Pract. 2015 Apr 21;1:5. doi: 10.1186/2054-7099-1-5. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care for management of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is expectant management. However, the emotional impact of pregnancy losses and the urgency to conceive often leads couples to consider a variety of fertility treatments. The objective of this study is to report the time to next pregnancy and subsequent live birth and miscarriage rates in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who choose to attempt spontaneous conception compared to those that opt to pursue fertility treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of one hundred and fifty-eight fertile RPL patients treated at a university-based fertility center. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were encouraged to attempt spontaneous conception, but allowed to initiate fertility treatments (ovarian stimulation, insemination, IVF or PGS) according to their preferences. Main outcome measures were time to next pregnancy and pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

For those patients who achieved a spontaneous conception, 88% conceived within 6 months, with a median time of 2 months and range of 1-10 months. Patients using IUI, IVF and PGS conceived in a median of 3, 4 and 5 months, respectively. The live birth rate and clinical miscarriage rate was not improved with any fertility treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the fertile RPL patient population, there does not appear to be a benefit to proceeding directly with fertility treatment. Patients should be encouraged to attempt spontaneous conception for at least 6 months.

摘要

背景

复发性流产患者目前的标准治疗方案是期待治疗。然而,流产带来的情感影响以及迫切想要怀孕的心情常常促使夫妇考虑各种生育治疗方法。本研究的目的是报告与选择接受生育治疗的复发性流产(RPL)可育患者相比,选择尝试自然受孕的患者下次怀孕的时间、随后的活产率和流产率。

方法

对在一家大学附属生育中心接受治疗的158例可育RPL患者进行回顾性队列研究。对患者进行至少6个月的随访。鼓励患者尝试自然受孕,但允许他们根据自己的意愿开始生育治疗(卵巢刺激、人工授精、体外受精或植入前基因筛查)。主要观察指标为下次怀孕时间和妊娠结局。

结果

对于那些自然受孕的患者,88%在6个月内受孕,中位时间为2个月,范围为1至10个月。接受宫腔内人工授精(IUI)、体外受精和植入前基因筛查的患者受孕的中位时间分别为3、4和5个月。任何生育治疗均未提高活产率和临床流产率。

结论

在可育的RPL患者群体中,直接进行生育治疗似乎没有益处。应鼓励患者尝试自然受孕至少6个月。

相似文献

5
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育症的宫腔内人工授精
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 3;3(3):CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6.
8
Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的宫内人工授精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 19;2:CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub5.

引用本文的文献

5
Microbiota-Dependent Effects of IL-22.IL-22 的微生物组依赖性效应。
Cells. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):2205. doi: 10.3390/cells9102205.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.复发性妊娠丢失的评估与治疗:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
6
Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss.复发性早期妊娠丢失的评估与管理
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;50(1):132-45. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31802f1c28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验