• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性流产女性的支持性护理:一项量化女性偏好的调查。

Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences.

机构信息

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):398-405. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des374. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/des374
PMID:23213179
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Supportive care is regularly offered to women with recurrent miscarriages (RMs). Their preferences for supportive care in their next pregnancy have been identified by qualitative research. The aim of this study was to quantify these supportive care preferences and identify women's characteristics that are associated with a higher or lower need for supportive care in women with RM.

METHODS

A questionnaire study was conducted in women with RMs (≥ 2 miscarriages) in three hospitals in the Netherlands. All women who received diagnostic work-up for RMs from January 2010 to December 2010 were sent a questionnaire. The questionnaire quantified supportive care options identified by a previous qualitative study. We next analysed associations between women's characteristics (age, ethnicity, education level, parity, pregnancy during questionnaire and time passed since last miscarriage) and their feelings about supportive care options to elucidate any differences between groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-six women were asked to participate in the study. In total, 174 women responded (response rate 65%) and 171 questionnaires were analysed. Women with RM preferred the following supportive care options for their next pregnancy: a plan with one doctor who shows understanding, takes them seriously, has knowledge of their obstetric history, listens to them, gives information about RM, shows empathy, informs on progress and enquires about emotional needs. Also, an ultrasound examination during symptoms, directly after a positive pregnancy test and every 2 weeks. Finally, if a miscarriage occurred, most women would prefer to talk to a medical or psychological professional afterwards. The majority of women expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and for bereavement therapy. The median preference, on a scale from 1 to 10, for supportive care was 8.0. Ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with RM preferred a plan for the first trimester that involved one doctor, ultrasounds and the exercise of soft skills, like showing understanding, listening skills, awareness of obstetrical history and respect towards the patient and their miscarriage, by the health care professionals. In the event of a miscarriage, women prefer aftercare. Women from ethnic minorities and women who were not pregnant during the questionnaire investigation were the two patient groups who preferred the most supportive care options. Tailor-made supportive care can now be offered to women with RM.

摘要

背景

经常为复发性流产(RM)的女性提供支持性护理。通过定性研究确定了她们对下一次妊娠中支持性护理的偏好。本研究的目的是量化这些支持性护理偏好,并确定与 RM 女性对支持性护理的更高或更低需求相关的女性特征。

方法

在荷兰的三家医院对 RM(≥2 次流产)的女性进行了一项问卷调查研究。2010 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间接受 RM 诊断检查的所有女性均被发送了一份问卷。该问卷量化了先前定性研究确定的支持性护理方案。我们接下来分析了女性特征(年龄、种族、教育水平、生育次数、问卷期间怀孕以及上次流产后时间)与她们对支持性护理方案的感受之间的关联,以阐明组间的任何差异。

结果

邀请了 266 名女性参与研究。共有 174 名女性(应答率为 65%)做出回应,并对 171 份问卷进行了分析。RM 女性对下次妊娠的以下支持性护理方案表示偏好:一位能够理解、认真对待、了解她们的产科病史、倾听、提供 RM 信息、表现出同理心、告知进展情况并询问情感需求的医生。此外,还需要在出现症状时、阳性妊娠试验后直接以及每 2 周进行一次超声检查。如果发生流产,大多数女性更愿意在之后与医疗或心理专业人员交谈。大多数女性对在与上次流产相同的妊娠周数时住院治疗以及丧亲治疗的偏好较低。在 1 到 10 的量表上,支持性护理的中位数偏好为 8.0。种族、生育次数和调查时的怀孕情况与不同的偏好相关,但女性年龄、教育水平和上次流产后时间则没有。

结论

RM 女性更喜欢由一位医生、超声检查和软技能(如理解、倾听技巧、对产科病史的认识以及对患者及其流产的尊重)组成的妊娠早期计划。如果发生流产,女性更希望得到后续护理。少数民族妇女和调查期间未怀孕的妇女是最需要支持性护理方案的两个患者群体。现在可以为 RM 女性提供定制的支持性护理。

相似文献

1
Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences.复发性流产女性的支持性护理:一项量化女性偏好的调查。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):398-405. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des374. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Supportive care for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: patients' perspectives.支持性护理对不明原因复发性流产的女性:患者的观点。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):873-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der021. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
3
Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.探讨不明原因复发性妊娠丢失夫妇中性别差异与支持性护理偏好的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4.
4
Recurrent miscarriage clinics.复发性流产诊所
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;41(1):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
5
A feasibility trial of screening women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage for high uterine natural killer cell density and randomizing to prednisolone or placebo when pregnant.一项针对特发性复发性流产女性进行高子宫自然杀伤细胞密度筛查,并在怀孕时随机分配予泼尼松龙或安慰剂的可行性试验。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1743-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det117. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.首选分娩地点:荷兰低危初产妇的特征和动机。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):609-18. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
7
Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.对于不明原因的复发性流产,未可视化的妊娠丢失在预后方面具有重要意义。
Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):931-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu042. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留后影响女性对进一步处理选择偏好的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1674-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex216.
9
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下,很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
Factors that shape recurrent miscarriage care experiences: findings from a national survey.影响复发性流产护理体验的因素:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09347-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study.爱尔兰共和国知识使用者对复发性流产服务与支持的看法:一项定性访谈研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 10;15(4):e094753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094753.
2
Knights in shining armour and (M)others in life jackets: Women's experiences of advocating for care alone when suffering recurrent early pregnancy loss during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.身披闪亮铠甲的骑士与穿着救生衣的(母)亲:新冠疫情期间女性在反复早期妊娠丢失时独自争取护理的经历
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20882-2.
3
Estimating the costs associated with the implementation of a best practice model of care for recurrent miscarriage clinics in Ireland: a cost analysis.
估算爱尔兰复发性流产诊所实施最佳护理模式相关的成本:一项成本分析。
HRB Open Res. 2022 Nov 16;5:74. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13625.1. eCollection 2022.
4
The predictive value of ultrasound markers for pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective study.超声标志物对复发性流产妊娠结局的预测价值:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67744-w.
5
Lived experience of recurrent miscarriage: women and their partners' experience of subsequent pregnancy and support within an NHS specialist clinic - a qualitative study.反复性流产的生活体验:在 NHS 专科诊所中,女性及其伴侣在后续妊娠和支持方面的体验——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e075062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075062.
6
'You're never pregnant in the same way again': prior early pregnancy loss influences need for health care and support in subsequent pregnancy.“你再也不会以同样的方式怀孕了”:既往早期妊娠丢失会影响后续妊娠时对医疗保健和支持的需求。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 1;2023(3):hoad032. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad032. eCollection 2023.
7
Recurrent Miscarriage: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/050, May 2022).复发性流产:诊断与治疗程序。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S2k级别,德国医学科学信息平台注册编号015/050,2022年5月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 25;83(1):49-78. doi: 10.1055/a-1895-9940. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Applying Scientific Rationale to the Current Perceptions and Explanations of Massage and Miscarriage in the First Trimester.将科学原理应用于当前对孕早期按摩与流产的认知及解释
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023 Mar 1;16(1):30-43. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.771. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Reproductive outcomes following recurrent first-trimester miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study.复发性孕早期流产后的生殖结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Oct 11;2022(4):hoac045. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac045. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.探讨不明原因复发性妊娠丢失夫妇中性别差异与支持性护理偏好的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4.