Hüls Anke, Frömke Cornelia, Ickstadt Katja, Hille Katja, Hering Johanna, von Münchhausen Christiane, Hartmann Maria, Kreienbrock Lothar
Faculty of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
IUF-Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 May 31;4:71. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00071. eCollection 2017.
Antimicrobial resistance in livestock is a matter of general concern. To develop hygiene measures and methods for resistance prevention and control, epidemiological studies on a population level are needed to detect factors associated with antimicrobial resistance in livestock holdings. In general, regression models are used to describe these relationships between environmental factors and resistance outcome. Besides the study design, the correlation structures of the different outcomes of antibiotic resistance and structural zero measurements on the resistance outcome as well as on the exposure side are challenges for the epidemiological model building process. The use of appropriate regression models that acknowledge these complexities is essential to assure valid epidemiological interpretations. The aims of this paper are (i) to explain the model building process comparing several competing models for count data (negative binomial model, quasi-Poisson model, zero-inflated model, and hurdle model) and (ii) to compare these models using data from a cross-sectional study on antibiotic resistance in animal husbandry. These goals are essential to evaluate which model is most suitable to identify potential prevention measures. The dataset used as an example in our analyses was generated initially to study the prevalence and associated factors for the appearance of cefotaxime-resistant in 48 German fattening pig farms. For each farm, the outcome was the count of samples with resistant bacteria. There was almost no overdispersion and only moderate evidence of excess zeros in the data. Our analyses show that it is essential to evaluate regression models in studies analyzing the relationship between environmental factors and antibiotic resistances in livestock. After model comparison based on evaluation of model predictions, Akaike information criterion, and Pearson residuals, here the hurdle model was judged to be the most appropriate model.
家畜中的抗菌药物耐药性是一个普遍关注的问题。为了制定预防和控制耐药性的卫生措施和方法,需要在种群水平上进行流行病学研究,以检测与家畜养殖场抗菌药物耐药性相关的因素。一般来说,回归模型用于描述环境因素与耐药结果之间的这些关系。除了研究设计外,抗生素耐药性不同结果的相关结构以及耐药结果和暴露方面的结构性零测量值,是流行病学模型构建过程中的挑战。使用承认这些复杂性的适当回归模型对于确保有效的流行病学解释至关重要。本文的目的是:(i)解释模型构建过程,比较几种用于计数数据的竞争模型(负二项式模型、拟泊松模型、零膨胀模型和障碍模型);(ii)使用来自畜牧业抗生素耐药性横断面研究的数据比较这些模型。这些目标对于评估哪种模型最适合识别潜在的预防措施至关重要。我们分析中用作示例的数据集最初是为了研究德国48个育肥猪场中耐头孢噻肟菌出现的患病率及相关因素而生成的。对于每个猪场,结果是带有耐药菌的样本计数。数据中几乎没有过度离散,只有适度的零过多证据。我们的分析表明,在分析家畜环境因素与抗生素耐药性之间关系的研究中,评估回归模型至关重要。基于模型预测、赤池信息准则和皮尔逊残差的评估进行模型比较后,此处判定障碍模型是最合适的模型。