Suppr超能文献

临床实践指南:纳入患者小组的意见。

Clinical Practice Guidelines: Incorporating Input From a Patient Panel.

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1002/acr.23275. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the integral role of a Patient Panel in the development of the 2017 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) clinical practice guideline.

METHODS

We convened a Panel of 11 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, all of whom had undergone 1 or more arthroplasties, to review the evidence and provide guidance on recommendations for the 2017 ACR/AAHKS guideline to address the perioperative management of antirheumatic medication in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The guideline used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology that acknowledges the critical role of patient values and preferences when the quality of the evidence base is low or when there are important trade-offs between benefits and harms. The Patient Panel considered the relative importance of complications including perioperative infection versus rheumatic disease flare and voted on the recommendations. Before the Voting Panel's own discussion of the recommendations, they reviewed a summary of the Patient Panel's discussion, including their perioperative experience, the relative importance they placed on infections versus flares in the perioperative period, and their votes on the recommendations.

RESULTS

The Patient Panel placed higher importance on avoiding an infection than a disease flare despite the far greater frequency of flares than infections. The decisions of the Voting Panel were concordant with those of the Patient Panel. For the 7 recommendations that both Panels voted on, the Panels agreed on the direction as well as the strength of recommendation (which was conditional for all recommendations).

CONCLUSION

The Voting Panel considered the importance that the patients placed on risk of infection. The Patient Panel's values informed the direction and strength of the recommendations in the final 2017 ACR/AAHKS guideline.

摘要

目的

描述患者小组在制定 2017 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)/美国髋关节和膝关节外科医师学会(AAHKS)临床实践指南中的整体作用。

方法

我们召集了一个由 11 名患有类风湿关节炎和幼年特发性关节炎的患者组成的小组,所有患者都接受过 1 次或多次关节置换术,以审查证据并就 2017 年 ACR/AAHKS 指南的建议提供指导,以解决接受择期全髋关节或全膝关节置换术的风湿病患者围手术期抗风湿药物管理问题。该指南使用了推荐评估、制定和评估分级系统,承认当证据基础质量低或在收益与危害之间存在重要权衡时,患者价值观和偏好的关键作用。患者小组考虑了包括围手术期感染与风湿疾病发作在内的并发症的相对重要性,并对建议进行投票。在投票小组对建议进行讨论之前,他们审查了患者小组讨论的摘要,包括他们的围手术期经验、他们对围手术期感染与发作的相对重视程度以及对建议的投票情况。

结果

尽管疾病发作的频率远高于感染,但患者小组更重视避免感染而不是疾病发作。投票小组的决定与患者小组一致。对于两个小组都投票的 7 项建议,小组在建议的方向和强度上达成一致(所有建议都是有条件的)。

结论

投票小组考虑了患者对感染风险的重视程度。患者小组的价值观为最终 2017 年 ACR/AAHKS 指南中的建议方向和强度提供了信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验