Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Nov;38(11):2193-2201. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.
目的:制定基于循证医学的髋关节和膝关节置换术最佳时机的共识推荐意见,以改善患者重要结局,包括但不限于疼痛、功能、感染、住院和 1 年死亡率,适用于有症状和影像学表现为中度至重度骨关节炎或有症状的继发性髋或膝关节骨坏死的患者,这些患者先前尝试过非手术治疗且无效,并选择接受择期髋关节或膝关节置换术(统称为 TJA)。
方法:我们制定了 13 个具有临床相关性的人群、干预措施、对照措施和结局(PICO)问题。在系统文献回顾后,使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据质量(高、中、低或极低)进行分级,并创建证据表。一个由 13 名医生和患者组成的投票小组讨论了 PICO 问题,直到就建议的方向(赞成/反对)和强度(强烈/有条件)达成共识。
结果:专家组有条件地反对为了追求额外的非手术治疗而延迟 TJA,包括物理治疗、非甾体抗炎药、助行器和关节内注射。专家组有条件地建议为了减少或戒烟而延迟 TJA。专家组有条件地建议为了更好地控制血糖水平而延迟 TJA,适用于患有糖尿病的患者,但未确定具体的措施或水平。专家组一致认为肥胖本身并不是延迟的原因,但应强烈鼓励减肥,并讨论手术风险增加的问题。专家组有条件地反对在有严重畸形或骨丢失或有神经关节的患者中延迟 TJA。所有建议的证据质量均为低或极低质量。
结论:本指南提供了关于在对非手术治疗无效的有症状和影像学表现为中度至重度骨关节炎或有症状的继发性髋或膝关节骨坏死的患者中进行 TJA 的最佳时机的循证建议,以改善患者重要结局,包括疼痛、功能、感染、住院和 1 年死亡率。我们承认证据质量主要是由于间接性而较低,并希望未来的研究能够进一步完善这些建议。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020-1-6
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025-8
Ital J Pediatr. 2025-1-29
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025-1-23