a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , School of Public Health, West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
b Icelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis , Reykjavik University , Reykjavik , Iceland.
Subst Abus. 2017 Oct-Dec;38(4):473-476. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1343218. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of substance use in e-cigarette (EC)-only users with combustible cigarette (CC)-only users, dual users, and nonusers in a large sample of middle school-aged adolescents.
Population-based cross-sectional school survey conducted in 15 middle schools in 3 counties in West Virginia in the United States between October and December of 2015 (N = 6547, girls = 49.6%; response rate 84.7%).
Approximately 4.3% of participants had used EC only, 4.5% had used CC only, and around 5.5% were dual users. Nonusers had the lowest prevalence of all 9 forms of substance use assessed in the study (i.e., chewing tobacco, any alcohol, drunkenness, marijuana, sniffing, prescription drugs, hallucinogens, synthetic marijuana, and bath salts), followed by EC and CC users. Dual users had the highest prevalence of 8 of 9 forms of substance use. Multinomial logistic regression models showed that EC-only users had significantly greater odds over nonusers of using 8 of 9 types of substances included in the study. Conversely, EC-only users had significantly lower odds of using 7 of 9 types of substances when compared with dual users. However, EC-only users did not differ from CC-only users in odds of use in any of the 9 substances included in this analysis.
Among middle school-aged adolescents, EC-only users do not differ from CC-only users in odds for other forms of substance use. Primary prevention programs should consider EC use initiation as a pathway to greater risk of other licit and illicit substances among young adolescents.
本研究旨在比较仅使用电子烟(EC)、仅使用可燃香烟(CC)、同时使用 EC 和 CC 以及不使用任何烟草制品的中学生群体中,物质使用的流行率。
这是一项在美国西弗吉尼亚州 3 个县的 15 所中学进行的基于人群的横断面学校调查,于 2015 年 10 月至 12 月进行(N = 6547,女生占 49.6%;应答率为 84.7%)。
约有 4.3%的参与者使用过 EC,4.5%的参与者使用过 CC,约 5.5%的参与者同时使用过 EC 和 CC。非使用者的所有 9 种研究评估的物质使用的流行率最低(即咀嚼烟草、任何酒精、醉酒、大麻、嗅吸、处方药物、致幻剂、合成大麻和浴盐),其次是 EC 和 CC 用户。双重使用者具有 8 种物质使用的最高流行率。多项逻辑回归模型表明,与非使用者相比,EC 仅使用者使用研究中包括的 9 种物质中的 8 种物质的可能性显著更大。相反,与双重使用者相比,EC 仅使用者使用 7 种物质的可能性显著较低。然而,EC 仅使用者在包括在本分析中的 9 种物质中的任何一种物质的使用可能性方面与 CC 仅使用者没有差异。
在中学生中,EC 仅使用者与 CC 仅使用者在使用其他形式物质的可能性方面没有差异。初级预防计划应考虑将 EC 使用的启动作为青少年使用其他合法和非法物质的更高风险的途径。